It looks like LLNS is hiring!
See these openings
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
“Raise a concern, get blackballed then lose your job and benefits…” “…instead of raising your concerns just leverage on your skills and go t...
4 comments:
Friggen idiots. Fire people and lay them off because they make to much money and then hire dumb butts in at a very cheap wage. Make sure the words get out what these people made before, so the new hires don't come in for any less. They need to tell LLNL to pound sand and demand higher wages then they got before they left.
If you look closely it's not LLNS hiring, it's a couple of subcontractors. You may quibble over that distinction but it is a huge difference to be working FOR the lab (as an FTE) as opposed to working AT the lab (for subcontractor). It's easier to make the flex terms and contractors vanish. That may change if Bechtel can figure out how to get rid of a lot of people via the AT WILL status we are now under, but as the game is now played, flex term and contract people are cannon fodder.
Newsflash, this is in NIF, you know, the part of the lab that got exempted from the voluntary and potential involuntary separation plan?
So far as I can see this is business as usual for NIF.
Higher turnover equals higher security risk. If we have a major security leak I suspect the entire management chain will be on the chopping block. It will be well deserved for their attempt to merge corporate hatchet tactics with a high-security environment. Wake up management, havent you been reading the news?
--boeing engineer/Chinese spy:
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-31884820080211
Post a Comment