Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Are GM and ULM guilt of high treason?

Contributed anonymously:

1. Aid and comfort to the enemy. The capabilities of the US to defend itself from future threats are certainly less now. Not doubt Russia, China, and Middle-East powers are greatly pleased by the destruction of LLNL.

2. There was intent to commit harm on the US by crippling the ability of LLNL to be a competent steward of the nuclear stockpile. GM and ULM cannot claim ignorance of what might happen. This is supported by the timeline of events and number of managers who collaborated in the efforts. Clearly the actions taken were carefully planned and widely discussed prior to execution. Therefore malice and forethought.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please take a deep breath. Comparing what we are going through to acts of high treason is mind boggling.

What next, ULM was on the grassy knoll in Dallas back in November '63?

Anonymous said...

Seems a simple enough question.

If the reason stated is good enough - say yes. If not, say why.

Tempted to say yes. After all, we have a lot of comments here about how the mission has been damaged.

Anonymous said...

"Intent to commit harm" is in the eye of the beholder. The Federal establishment sent this train in motion. There were different drivers in play than our happiness, but spraying around the term 'treason' is not supported by the two assertions posted. Are we going to take years to work through this? Yes. Is our ability to be a "competent steward of the nuclear stockpile" crippled? Hardly. Who knows, perhaps adversaries are displeased because 100's of mega-bucks will be available to invest in other arenas. Course that's chump change compared to what we've dropped in other hemispheres.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days