Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Thursday, January 17, 2013

OMB Directs Agencies To Intensify Planning For Possible Sequestration Cuts

Weapons Complex Monitor
January 16, 2013

OMB Directs Agencies To Intensify Planning For Possible Sequestration Cuts

The Department of Energy and other federal agencies have been directed to “intensify efforts” to prepare for the looming funding cuts known as sequestration. In a Jan. 14 memorandum, the White House Office of Management and Budget told federal agencies to continue their planning efforts in the event sequestration is implemented this spring, including taking such steps as identifying “the most appropriate means to reduce civilian workforce costs where necessary— this may include imposing hiring freezes, releasing temporary employees or not renewing term or contract hires, authorizing voluntary separation incentives and voluntary early retirements, or implementing administrative furloughs”; and reviewing “grants and contracts to determine where cost savings may be achieved In a manner that is consistent with the applicable terms and conditions.” The OMB memo states, “While agency plans should reflect intensified efforts to prepare for operations under a potential sequestration, actions that would implement reductions specifically designed as a response to sequestration should generally not be taken at this time. In some cases, however, the overall budgetary uncertainty and operational constraints may require that certain actions be taken in the immediate-or near-term.”

The sequestration process is set to involve a total of $1.2 trillion in funding cuts, equally divided between defense and non-defense funding, over 10 years unless similar deficit reduction legislation is approved. For DOE’s Office of Environmental Management, sequestration would entail a 9.4 percent cut for defense environmental cleanup funding and cuts of 8.2 percent to nondefense environmental cleanup funding and uranium enrichment D&D funding. For the National Nuclear Security Administration, the sequestration cuts would amount to 9.4 percent reductions to weapons and nonproliferation programs. Sequestration was to have gone into effect Jan. 2, but lawmakers approved a measure to push the cuts back until March. “The Administration continues to urge Congress to take prompt action to address the current budgetary uncertainty, including through the enactment of balanced deficit reduction to avoid sequestration,” the OMB memo says, adding, “Should Congress fail to act to avoid sequestration, there will be significant and harmful impacts on a wide variety of Government services and operations.”

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why would any younger employee's stay at LANL? The budget is in decline, the work environment, is indeed challenging, and the future is not bright. Recruitment will be difficult,the hey day of big budgets and 6 hour days is coming to an end. But I think we all saw this coming a long time ago.....

Anonymous said...

Not only that , the numbers of RIFs being thrown around are "astonishing", this fiscal mess could set Los Alamos, and surrounding communities back to the Stone Age.......

Anonymous said...

And they worry about my piddling waste.

A 10% reduction of a years budget at midyear is a real 20% reduction going forward. It takes 1-2 months to reduce those items (firing, furloughs, salary reductions) that can be done.

All planned work must stop as managers and employees plan how to accomplish this Congressional Moondance.

Waste - complete. Fraud - massive. Abuse - of their congressional responsibilities.

Who can compete with this?

Anonymous said...

The terms "NNSA national labs" and "Long-term career" are mutually exclusive.

The trend is for naive, young, highly educated staff to come into the labs for a few years as post docs at a low salary, be worked hard and told to struggle with less and less funding, and then for these same employees to leave in disgust after about 5 years.

It allows the managers to continue making their huge salaries while both benefits and salaries associated with the "worker-bees" is cut to a bare minimum.

And, believe me, that's exactly the way NNSA wants it! They place little value on hard won expertise and seasoned scientific capabilities. Only the phony LLC metrics and an occasional over-hyped scientific "discover" matter to these people.


Anonymous said...

I hope like hell LLNL take advantage of the VSIP as long as the hunk of change, age and years of service is 3 & 3. If they'd just make it worthwhile ~50% of LLNL would be gone leaving all those jobs for the young who will need to work for the rest of their lives since they have no penion and don't make enough to save $1.5M - $2M in their 401k before 55 they way salaies are going. Let's hope for bailout, time in grade and time in service VSIP to come soon.

Anonymous said...

I hope like hell LLNL take advantage of the VSIP as long as the hunk of change, age and years of service is 3 & 3. If they'd just make it worthwhile ~50% of LLNL would be gone leaving all those jobs for the young who will need to work for the rest of their lives since they have no penion and don't make enough to save $1.5M - $2M in their 401k before 55 they way salaies are going. Let's hope for bailout, time in grade and time in service VSIP to come soon.

Anonymous said...

There is that one program unmentionable that is doing very well, and their is the new lovely in ...

Anonymous said...

And cialis is covered by CVS/Caremark!

Anonymous said...

One more idea and I don't care about the law but I know what would be nice. Put the severance pay in the persons 401k or 403b tax free. That would get rid of a lot of people right now, see yah later alligator.

Anonymous said...

One more idea and I don't care about the law but I know what would be nice.

January 22, 2013 at 1:47 PM

"Don't care about the law"?? So typical. Are you a Democrat? Thought so. Do you even know about the law? Thought not.

Anonymous said...

January 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM

Nope, just smeone who knows how to reduce the labs population by 50% with screwing over its people and yet retain jobs for the young. Got a problem with that AH?

Anonymous said...

January 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM

Nope, just smeone who knows how to reduce the labs population by 50% with screwing over its people and yet retain jobs for the young. Got a problem with that AH?

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days