Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
“Raise a concern, get blackballed then lose your job and benefits…” “…instead of raising your concerns just leverage on your skills and go t...
2 comments:
Returning to compliance with regulations is good only in relation to the fact they were out of compliance when abusing the discriminatory overhead rates long after the completion of the build of NIF.
The fact that they are returning the "savings" to other programs brought about by the corrected overhead rates, back into NIF, is just evidence returning to the abusive practices, as the end effect is the same - discriminatory overhead rates that penalize non-NIF programs.
A relevent fact to consider is what is the ratio of IG complaints received per site vs. how many IG audits or inspections were actually "opened". Further - how long did it take to get a report published once the audit or inspection began? Two years? Three years? And what was the relevency by then...pretty uninteresting stuff if it is made stale enough.
Post a Comment