contributed by J. Franklin
http://knoxblogs.com/atomiccity/2014/02/20/heres-bruce-held-said/#more-11729
Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
“Raise a concern, get blackballed then lose your job and benefits…” “…instead of raising your concerns just leverage on your skills and go t...
2 comments:
"What generated a lot of talk were Held’s comments about ... a move away from high fees and profit-making and a move toward the greater interests of the nation. When federal contractors hear references to the government possibly chopping fees their ears tend to get a little bigger.
My recollection (which is not guaranteed accurate) is that the Labs did not ask for high fees. AT&T's no-fee, no-risk contract at Sandia was up for renewal in 1993 and DOE Secretary Hazel O'Leary insisted Sandia have a fee-based contract so she could punish the contractor by withholding fees if something went wrong. AT&T said no way; Martin Marietta (which soon merged with Lockheed) got the fee-based contract.
Thanks to whoever posted this article. Clarified the remarks and context.
Post a Comment