Monday, January 29, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
LGBT intolerance problem at Sandia? I was just checking glassdoor.com and noticed several comments suggesting intolerance to LGBT at Sandia...
-
So did you SSVSP and why? Give details.
-
“Raise a concern, get blackballed then lose your job and benefits…” “…instead of raising your concerns just leverage on your skills and go t...
4 comments:
There is nothing inherently wrong with above package raises and bonuses to reward employee performance. When those raises and bonuses are not disclosed though, the risk of conflict of interest conduct and gift related expectations can become a workplace problem. For-profit contractors with national and international interests permitted to dole out secret salaries and bonuses to employees undermines DOE "good security practices". Publicly disclosed performance based salary increases and bonuses are reasonable. Undisclosed salary increases and bonuses open the door to bribery, collusion, and hush money, all DOE contractor No-Nos.
I liked it when UC was forced to publicly list the salaries of everyone at LLNL and LANL.
Transparency is a good thing.
"I liked it when UC was forced to publicly list the salaries of everyone at LLNL and LANL. Transparency is a good thing."
Has SPSE made an attempt to have LLNS salaries and bonuses publicly disclosed as they did with UC/LLNL? The "we are a private company so we don't need to release such information" argument doesn't seem to be supportable in DOE contractor space.
Employees doing the bidding for LANSLLNS with the understanding they will receive large bonuses and large pay raises in secret for doing so? Couldn't happen. Employees aren't allowed to be bought off. It says as much in the security refresher right?
Post a Comment