tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post3592575655748249085..comments2024-03-18T19:37:27.992-07:00Comments on LLNL - The True Story -: The American Physical Society (APS) update Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger67125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-26595161186771368452017-04-14T08:13:45.374-07:002017-04-14T08:13:45.374-07:00Talk about rants...
Talk about rants...<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-31837805196528885802017-04-13T20:35:34.123-07:002017-04-13T20:35:34.123-07:00"Yep, everyone knows "common sense"...<br />"Yep, everyone knows "common sense" being, of course, common, obviates the need for any facts at all. "<br /><br />You have never provided any facts at all in any of your crazy rantings. Every few weeks you come out with another nutty statement and when actual facts are provided you simply ignore them or counter with pure opinion or claim you have facts but they are classified. Do you realize the complete irony of you talking about facts? Anyone with common sense can see through an argument like " they sky is green" even though you think it is blue. I have classified information that it is green and that is a "fact". I would guess that you are so bat*t crazy and bitter at this point that you have no idea what sense even is common or not. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-20036242584153950962017-04-13T20:29:21.548-07:002017-04-13T20:29:21.548-07:00Back on topic: March for Science is really just a...Back on topic: March for Science is really just a front for far-left crazies, as shown here, http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/13/march-for-science-group-laments-trumps-bombing-of-marginalized-isis-fighters/ <br /><br />Wake up, APS, or lose your membership that tends more towards conservative than the college of social work across the quadrangle. Your mission is to promote physics, not promote divisive political groups that your anarchist campus colleagues favor.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-12660082652060785612017-04-13T19:19:16.795-07:002017-04-13T19:19:16.795-07:00Yep, everyone knows "common sense" being...Yep, everyone knows "common sense" being, of course, common, obviates the need for any facts at all. Keep digging. You'll get to the bottom of...something. Sooner or later.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-82213963208012897632017-04-13T18:15:29.375-07:002017-04-13T18:15:29.375-07:00
Takes one to know one, I guess.
April 1...<br /><br /> Takes one to know one, I guess.<br /><br /> April 13, 2017 at 9:31 AM<br /><br />Actually it only takes someone with an once of common sense to see through contradictions, dodges, denial and out and out lies. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-50331219133752060022017-04-13T09:31:14.724-07:002017-04-13T09:31:14.724-07:00Takes one to know one, I guess.Takes one to know one, I guess.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-87266213631351698902017-04-12T22:46:56.795-07:002017-04-12T22:46:56.795-07:00A comparison that I consider in my favor.
April 1...A comparison that I consider in my favor.<br /><br />April 12, 2017 at 9:33 PM<br /><br />Ok you are pathetic, crazy and bitter. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-3415846158967346962017-04-12T21:33:43.945-07:002017-04-12T21:33:43.945-07:00A comparison that I consider in my favor.A comparison that I consider in my favor.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-62254624198720272062017-04-12T15:15:49.540-07:002017-04-12T15:15:49.540-07:00
Sheesh. You are insane.
April 12, 2017 ...<br /><br /> Sheesh. You are insane.<br /><br /> April 12, 2017 at 9:59 AM<br /><br />And you are pathetic. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-67025046327384889262017-04-12T09:59:58.070-07:002017-04-12T09:59:58.070-07:00Sheesh. You are insane.Sheesh. You are insane.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-66820424066656181482017-04-12T07:33:01.356-07:002017-04-12T07:33:01.356-07:00"I know what I know. You don't know what ..."I know what I know. You don't know what you don't know."<br /><br />How about some other possibilities? . (1) You could be lying. (2) Stretching the truth to your own ends. (3) Have outdated information. (4) Are just really confused about what you think you know. (4) You just repeating what one of your drinking buddies says at the bar. You know the same buddy who claims to be a ex-seal team 6+ super sniper who was in Vietnam even though he weighs 400 lbs and is 45 years old. You cannot find anything about his service because it is all "classified" but that just proves he must know what he is talking about when in comes to classified stuff that you cannot talk about unless it is at a bar or on a blog. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-86469774617345321192017-04-12T00:04:21.862-07:002017-04-12T00:04:21.862-07:00You do not know what you claim to know. You may ha...You do not know what you claim to know. You may have been briefed with disinformation early on but you clearly were not involved with the case at its conclusion. The Government's case completely fell apart and the judge found out that some individuals in the Clinton Administration perjured themselves..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-14773264109706972332017-04-11T21:16:40.939-07:002017-04-11T21:16:40.939-07:00I said enough, so enough. Get over yourself. I'...I said enough, so enough. Get over yourself. I'm done with you. I know what I know. You don't know what you don't know.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-38236972605399434522017-04-11T20:34:57.887-07:002017-04-11T20:34:57.887-07:00"The trial judge never got to see or rule on ..."The trial judge never got to see or rule on the classified evidence against WHL because that aspect of the trial was cancelled when the government decided to drop any charges that might require divulging SRD. "<br /><br />How come there has been so many other cases where SRD was involved that went to trial? What makes the WHL case so special?<br />As one of the posters said it is routine in such cases to grant the judge a clearance. Again what makes the WHL case so special?<br />You never respond to this. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-38757582981135057142017-04-11T20:28:55.843-07:002017-04-11T20:28:55.843-07:00April 11, 2017 at 7:22 PM
Others who claim they ...April 11, 2017 at 7:22 PM<br /><br />Others who claim they have first hand knowlege say the opposite of what you have said.<br /><br />"The trial judge never got to see or rule on the classified evidence against WHL because that aspect of the trial was cancelled when the government decided to drop any charges that might require divulging SRD."<br /><br />You keep saying this but the FBI would have known this before even charging the person so again it is just not credible. The better explanation is that they simply where wrong about the evidence they had, they just did not understand the nature of the evidence and when they figured it out they knew they had no case and had to drop the charges. This is the story that many others who also claim they have first hand knowlege of the case state and also jives with the many news stories about the subject. I guess you want to be seen as "special" and know secret stuff you cannot talk about except on this blog of course. <br /><br />The bottom line is the case is over and done and WHL was never charged as a spy or traitor, was apologized to, and won a considerable amount of money. These results seem more solid than rantings from a very bitter "anonymous" ex lab employee with axe to grind against the labs and UC. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-83913609695034300952017-04-11T19:22:41.428-07:002017-04-11T19:22:41.428-07:00There are apparently a lot of people here who thin...There are apparently a lot of people here who think they know something based on news stories or other second- or third-hand sources, but do not have first hand knowledge of the WHL case. Oh well...<br /><br />The trial judge never got to see or rule on the classified evidence against WHL because that aspect of the trial was cancelled when the government decided to drop any charges that might require divulging SRD. This is clearly different from military cases where at most SNSI info might be divulged.<br /><br />But enough, all those Trump voters will never accept that sometimes the government has the citizens' best interests in mind.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-75143148209726673052017-04-11T18:25:42.973-07:002017-04-11T18:25:42.973-07:0012:02 has moved into pure lies.
The "evidenc...12:02 has moved into pure lies.<br /><br />The "evidence" was NOT all classified, the evidence simply did not exist. There was NO evidence because WHL never had access to the specific information he was accused of sending to China.<br /><br />Judges are ROUTINELY granted security clearances so they can view classified info. If a particular judge has something in his/her background that disqualifies them from holding a clearance they will recuse themselves and another judge will take over. Classified evidence has never been an impediment to prosecution.<br /><br />12:02 is an ignorant, nutcase loudmouth. He is right about one single thing, he is special. Special as in qualified for special-ed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-1756696700605397722017-04-11T15:33:14.770-07:002017-04-11T15:33:14.770-07:00What a phony argument by 12:02!"the evidence ...What a phony argument by 12:02!"the evidence could not be given since it all classified." Classified evidence has been used in many other espionage cases. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-57733711506693827202017-04-11T12:02:33.318-07:002017-04-11T12:02:33.318-07:00>What about the apology the Federal judge issue...>What about the apology the Federal judge issued to WH<br /><br /><br />The Federal judge was ignorant of the facts because it was all classified. If you cannot <br />understand that you are an idiot. <br /><br /><br />>What about President Bill Clinton's apology to WHL? <br /><br />It is Bill Clinton, nuff said. This is not an argument of innocence as I should know. <br /><br />>What about the $895,000 the Government paid WHL? <br /><br />He could still be guilty but again the evidence could not be given since it all classified.<br />I really do not have a good argument as to why they would charge knowing they could not use the evidence so I will have to get back to you on that. UC ran the labs very badly though so that must have something to do with it. Besides we all know how screwed up the system is. Courts do not find you innocent, they find you not provably guilty by the level of the law even though everyone knows you are guilty. Courts cannot prove you innocent if you do not understand that you are an idiot and have a cultural problem. <br /> <br /><br />>The bottom line is Hiliar comitted felony mishandling of classified information and should be >in prison.<br /><br />Incorrect Hillary committed a felony Hiliar on the other hand is a completely innocent, WHL is also guilty but he was not proven to be so but was also not proven to be innocent so I am right to say he is not innocent. UC is bad, LANL is bad, and I am special very very special and if you do not understand that you are an idiot. <br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-37733589795370282512017-04-11T10:10:43.522-07:002017-04-11T10:10:43.522-07:009:10 PM obviously does not know about the event th...9:10 PM obviously does not know about the event that precipitated the witch-hunt that ended up railroading WHL without ANY evidence, nor does he know anything about the SPECIFIC information WHL was FALSELY accused of giving to China.<br /><br />Wow, some will suspend all their critical thinking to mindlessly defend their political indoctrination. <br /><br />What about the apology the Federal judge issued to WHL? 9:10 tells us we should believe him, not the judge. What about President Bill Clinton's apology to WHL? Again, 9:10 says "believe me, not President Clinton". What about the $895,000 the Government paid WHL? 9:10 says "ignore that, it doesn't matter, you should trust me even though I have no facts and have even made some stuff up". Obfuscation, all. <br /><br />The bottom line is Hiliar comitted felony mishandling of classified information and should be in prison.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-13369461313452993672017-04-11T09:23:43.063-07:002017-04-11T09:23:43.063-07:00How does one develop an immunity to facts? How does one develop an immunity to facts? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-37035250331959087422017-04-10T21:29:18.105-07:002017-04-10T21:29:18.105-07:00>WHL stole and divulged to persons unknown (sin...>WHL stole and divulged to persons unknown (since the tapes were never found) the >specific configuration of primary stages of US nuclear weapons, SRD in >classification. This is beyond dispute<br /><br />Total BS, you have no idea if he stole anything, no idea if anything was divulged to anyone, and no idea what information was this. There has never been any evidence that WHL provides anything to China, none. There is plenty of information of this case out there on the internet. <br /><br />>FBI never "proved" anything "false." They simply declined to provide to the court >evidence of its truth.<br /><br />You have no idea if that is true and in any case it makes no sense whatsoever and goes against everything that has been said or known. The idea that FBI would not provide evidence in court is ludicrous and sounds like a convenient excuse on your part. A better explanation is that they just did have the evidence they thought they had in the first place. Again there has been multiple cases in the past involving classified information that went to court and convictions where made. Why would the WHL case be so utterly different? Why would the even charge him if they never intended to prosecute? Why make the charges that you knew you would have to drop in the first place? You never ever address this point but keep implying that "you know" all the secret stuff but just cannot say. It sounds like bs, it smells like bs, and walks like bs. <br /><br />You have no idea what you are talking about or simply making it up. I am guessing both.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-1371255917609918492017-04-10T21:10:14.151-07:002017-04-10T21:10:14.151-07:00WHL stole and divulged to persons unknown (since t...WHL stole and divulged to persons unknown (since the tapes were never found) the specific configuration of primary stages of US nuclear weapons, SRD in classification. This is beyond dispute. To state that "no one at LANL" had access to that information is ludicrous. PARD was never an "official classification level" and no one has claimed it was, just a warning of how to protect the material if it were removed from the SRD system, prior to classification review. BTW, the FBI never "proved" anything "false." They simply declined to provide to the court evidence of its truth. If you can't see that difference, you are an idiot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-53404786179313707832017-04-10T20:45:54.788-07:002017-04-10T20:45:54.788-07:00Sorry PARD dude, WRONG. PARD never was an official...Sorry PARD dude, WRONG. PARD never was an official classification level, it was an unauthorized convenience used at LANL. The procedures were NOT changed after WHL, LANL just started following the rules that already existed. <br /><br />There never was a need for PARD in the first place as any computer media that touches an RD computer is automatically classified RD until it is downgraded through classification review by the CA. That rule existed in 1990, maybe earlier.<br /><br />In any case, it was was not the computer media at issue in the WHL case, the media was always RD. That's why WHL had to plead guilty to the single charge of mishandling classified information. <br /><br />What WAS at issue was what was on the media that WHL admitted to mishandling. The Government accused WHL of providing a SPECIFIC SET of info TO CHINA, Steve Younger's so called "crown jewels". <br /><br />That accusation was proven by the FBI to be completely false as WHL never had access to this PARTICULAR information. In fact, no one at LANL did. The material in question was NOT the material that originated at LANL, it was modified outside LANL.<br /><br />WHL was sentenced to time served for the single charge of mishandling classified material.<br /><br />Everyone with a security clearance has signed a paper acknowledging that mishandling classified info is a felony with penalties including loss of clearance, fines, and/or imprisonment. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5936951073896589340.post-72295060815834103872017-04-10T19:24:40.214-07:002017-04-10T19:24:40.214-07:00OK, enough erudite, reasoned debate on the facts. ...OK, enough erudite, reasoned debate on the facts. Insults rule, and reasoning ends, as usual. Welcome to modern U.S. society. Are you proud of it? I'm not. Any reason I should be?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com