Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

LLNL hiring practice

 A friend of mine,  an LLNL employee,   mentioned to me that when there is a search to fill an internal position, it is lab's policy to interview external candidates too.  

That's a great policy, except that what my friend  added was outrageous! Often times, an internal candidate had already been selected but the interviews continue.

Isn't this a waste of resources?  external candidates stand no chance!

This ought to be illegal.

I am an external candidate who was planning on joining the lab.

Would I be wasting my time?

Have you seen this practice? Has it always been in place or is it the brain child of LLNS?

Have you spoken up?


13 comments:

Anonymous said...

It happened often where I was, in Computations and CIO Office.
Speak up? At the lab, even you speak up
no one will hear you

Anonymous said...

Yes, jobs at LLNL are frequently “wired” for a preselected individual, while at the same time, resources are spent on go through the motions interviews knowing the outcome is basically predetermined.

Anonymous said...

That ought to be illegal!

Anonymous said...

“That ought to be illegal!”

Ought to be yes, but at LLNL it isn’t. It is far more difficult to move up in a “good ole boy”/ cronyism system if you are trying to preserve a particular culture within a you know, a legitimate playing field. DEI within LLNS? Yah right, not so good for the for-profit stakeholders.

Anonymous said...

“That ought to be illegal!”

LLNL hiring and advancement track record with claimed DEI:

1. division leader “appointed” to his position (no interviews)
2. 500 series no degree fabrication technician promoted to division Superintendent because her neighbor was a Division Leader
3. no tech degree individual hired and rapidly promoted by LLNL managers because he was a “minority of minorities” by CA standards
4. a 2 year degree electronics tech whose Daddy was in division management, gets the expressway to being hired an subsequent advancement

Anonymous said...

This sort of illegal hiring has been the rule at the Labs for decades. HR conspires with upper management to sanitize the process of promoting cronies. Even worse, those who object to the unfair treatment are immediately blackballed, while those who play along are promoted. The net result is layer upon layer of unethical, unqualified, overpaid, managers.

Anonymous said...

I worked at the lab for 5 years. I left because I thought it was a good place for those who put on the blinders and wait for retirement, not for achievers and enablers.
Most colleagues were fearful. No one dared criticizing management.
If you want to rise above "mediocre", look elsewhere.
I am certain many current workers don't agree. Try suggesting improvements or show creativity and see what that will get you.

Anonymous said...

“Most colleagues were fearful. No one dared criticizing management…Try suggesting improvements or show creativity and see what that will get you.”

And the root cause is?

LLNS worker bees are not part of the LLNS annual award fee metrics in any material way. There are no free market like profit concerns linked to the LLNS workforce since LLNS operates within a DOE/NNSA business bubble. Employee growth, job satisfaction, morale, etc., are orthogonal to this business relationship.

Anonymous said...

“There are no free market like profit concerns linked to the LLNS workforce since LLNS operates within a DOE/NNSA business bubble.”

When the “business bubble” is pushing 2 decades in duration, past quality workplace reference points prior to the “business bubble”, unfortunately have little meaning. Time for a LLNL contract change to a non-profit contactor.

Anonymous said...

We can only hope, personal honor and thoughtfulness, within LLNS management, will prevail while undisclosed compensation, power, and money, are right in front of them for the taking, especially for the unaccomplished, and or non-degreed LLNS management vulnerable staff. Yah.

Anonymous said...

“We can only hope, personal honor and thoughtfulness, within LLNS management, will prevail when undisclosed compensation, power, and money, are right in front of them for the taking, especially for the unaccomplished, and or non-degreed LLNS management vulnerable staff. Yah.”

Is this partially or completely true about LLNS?

Anonymous said...

If you are worried about the hiring practices at LLNL, you should see how the promotion process, yearly cost of living increases and bonuses for the special programs are handled.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for bringing this up.
Please give us details.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days