This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
THIS BLOG WILL NOT POST ANY MAGA PROPAGANDA OR ANY MISINFORMATION REGARDLESS OF SOURCE.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Friday, June 27, 2025
The many-worlds theory
This is a good critique of the many-worlds theory:
This conversation seemed like just random fluff. Did you look up the people in this discussion? This just does not come across as serious.
I have watched a few episodes of this guys channels and I have not gotten anything out of these conversations. On the whole I think this is giving physics a bad name. The list of guests is rather odd, or should a say self selective.
10:10 pm -- I don't understand it very well, and I posted it. Emily is I believe discussing this paper in particular, I have been meaning to look at it carefully:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.05259
Perhaps part of the argument is that many worlds does not make sense somehow? It could be like the old Buddhist argument, in more modern terms, perhaps:
3 comments:
This conversation seemed like just random fluff. Did you look up the people in this discussion? This just does not come across as serious.
I have watched a few episodes of this guys channels and I have not gotten anything out of these conversations. On the whole I think this is giving physics a bad name. The list of guests is rather odd, or should a say self selective.
10:10 pm -- I don't understand it very well, and I posted it. Emily is I believe discussing this paper in particular, I have been meaning to look at it carefully:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.05259
Perhaps part of the argument is that many worlds does not make sense somehow? It could be like the old Buddhist argument, in more modern terms, perhaps:
https://www.lionsroar.com/what-are-the-four-negations/
This is interesting too, perhaps it makes more sense to listen to this first:
https://spookyactionbook.com/2018/03/27/an-interview-with-emily-adlam-video/
https://youtu.be/6I2OhmVWLMs?si=wTkd71T2Gm4nlAoy
Post a Comment