Are safety and security at risk?
Here the question posed by anonymous:
LLNS/DOE has broken so many promises made to employees hired long ago under UC management.
So how long before one, two, or a lot of employees decide that given management broke one side of the contract they should start breaking theirs?
Safety, security, all kinds of things are at risk when people get this disgruntled.
4 comments:
None of this will occur. They will just simply leave LLNS when they get tired of their BS.
If being tired of BS was the only reason most non-managers should be already gone.
Look at other threads - people already have stated they are just going through the motions. It's just a matter of time before someone pulls a stunt and more than likely there will be others around that knew but did not care.
The best kind of protest, a paid one.
Morale,safety and,security??????
under LLNS aka Rechtel
building 170 gas leak sent people home sick.
building 241 gas leak: gas valve in fume hood left open filling room and hall way with gas.
building 321c berillium contaimenation laber only (GSE)personell and LLNL SKILL CRAFT personell have tested positive with berlluim desease.
doe report criticizing LLNS with failure to maintain boilers to state regulations,
doe criticizing llns for failure to maintain lab infrastructure to doe standards. the list goes on and on
Post a Comment