Skip to main content

Morale, safety and security

Image
By scooby
Are safety and security at risk?
Here the question posed by anonymous:

LLNS/DOE has broken so many promises made to employees hired long ago under UC management.

So how long before one, two, or a lot of employees decide that given management broke one side of the contract they should start breaking theirs?

Safety, security, all kinds of things are at risk when people get this disgruntled.

Comments

Anonymous said…
None of this will occur. They will just simply leave LLNS when they get tired of their BS.
10/19/2008 7:23 AM
Anonymous said…
If being tired of BS was the only reason most non-managers should be already gone.

Look at other threads - people already have stated they are just going through the motions. It's just a matter of time before someone pulls a stunt and more than likely there will be others around that knew but did not care.
10/20/2008 6:05 AM
Anonymous said…
The best kind of protest, a paid one.
10/24/2008 4:30 PM
Anonymous said…
Morale,safety and,security??????
under LLNS aka Rechtel
building 170 gas leak sent people home sick.
building 241 gas leak: gas valve in fume hood left open filling room and hall way with gas.
building 321c berillium contaimenation laber only (GSE)personell and LLNL SKILL CRAFT personell have tested positive with berlluim desease.
doe report criticizing LLNS with failure to maintain boilers to state regulations,
doe criticizing llns for failure to maintain lab infrastructure to doe standards. the list goes on and on
10/27/2008 9:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more