Skip to main content

Is the Energy Department Ready to Reboot the Country?


DOE must radically refocus!!!

Comments

Anonymous said…
DoE has not done one useful thing since Carter created it. All you get from them is predictions of fuel prices, never any action to remedy the situation.

Every promising energy project ends up getting killed. The existing technologies are getting regulated to death by DoE and EPA.

So we will be moving back into unheated caves soon. But we can feel proud that as a dieing species we used regulations to wipe ourselves out rather than some messy war. And we did it under budget and with no significant additions to our carbon footprint.
Anonymous said…
Alvarez knows what he is talking about. LLNL is over.
Anonymous said…
"LLNL is over."

Unfortunately you are right. The actions by the Rectel folks in top management are sickening. This is not a Lab any more. Ed Teller must be turning over in his grave.

I will soon be picking up my money and leaving. For those of you who are too young to retire, I feel sorry for you. Don't hang around a sick house.
Anonymous said…
Hey May 6, 2009 8:35 -
I have you figured out. I believe you post on every thread and say the same thing. I believe you are a troll on this blog.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...