Skip to main content

Raises

Question asked by (name pending contributor's permission):

Has anyone heard any facts/rumors about what the possible raise packages will be?

Comments

Anonymous said…
For 200s, it is 1.5%.
Anonymous said…
why aren't salary cards being distributed as in previous years?
Anonymous said…
The package numbers were all published (e.g., Newline or links from it) in December. They are numbers consistent with the current labor market.

The Laboratory will not print salary cards in order to use the more efficient Lapis on-line system. I wouldn't be surprised that some directorates end up printing some sort of notification to give the group leader something tangible to hand over.
Anonymous said…
Raises were 12%. 10.5% is skimmed off for the management.
Anonymous said…
January 29, 2010 7:38 PM

The rumor is. It's all a big secret now. You'll be interviewed by your supervisor sometime in Feb at which time you can express your dismay, all of which will be noted and sent back to the division office. At that time they'll release your < adequate pay raise and for some a reduction in salary. After Feb 18th you can log into LAPIS and find out what they think of you as an employee. Key note here. Know your base pay / hourly rate for this year and take note if you went + or -. You will never know what your co-worker is making again unless they're willing to tell you. Contact your Ombudsman if you have any issues. Good luck.
Anonymous said…
The percentages were listed in a Newsline sometime back, you can search around and find it there if back issues are still on line. If not there, it's on the HR site -or Strategic Human Capital or whatever the new age term is these days.

As to why salary cards are not being distributed? I can thing of two reasons:

1. Cost - same reason we're not getting pay stubs. The reasoning here is that every one has access to the web pages at the lab, push some electrons hither and yon and voila, no printing charges.

2. A more nefarious reason is that when you hand out bad news personally you are in close proximity to the person who may not be welcoming that bad news. Early in my career I had an inept supervisor who also was a coward. His method was to hand out the raise cards and then take vacation as soon as the last card was handed out.

If you do notification by proxy through the web, you can take vacation before the bad news comes out. Ain't technology grand?
Anonymous said…
I agree with 7:37 AM. Plan on seeing about 1.5%.

Of course, all of this and more could be eaten up by TCP1 employee contributions in the not too distant future. Plan on kicking in 2% to 4% of your salary to the pension if you are in TCP1.
Anonymous said…
They will have electronic salary cards that you will be able to get on Lapis, which is actually a good idea.
Anonymous said…
January 30, 2010 11:08 AM

So you get 1.5% and they take up to 4%, then they increase your medical cost and state taxes and what do you have. How about one big wopping pay cut not counting what's going to happen to a few who're going to see a (-) pay raise anyway. I've already seen the medical and state tax decrease in pay. I've standing by with the KY so it doesn't hurt to much. I love LLNS....
Anonymous said…
11:08 AM

There are zero plans for TPC1 employee contributions. TPC1 is still well overfunded. I guess you missed GM's discussion on this exact issue at his all-hands.
Anonymous said…
"TPC1 is still well overfunded. I guess you missed GM's discussion on this exact issue at his all-hands."

January 31, 2010 8:00 AM


You'd be amazed at how quickly this can change. Try not to act overly shocked when salary contributions for TCP1 kick in at some future date.
Anonymous said…
Last spring, LANS was telling LANL employees that their TCP1 pension was 134% over-funded. This year, they are suddenly telling employees that the pension is $76 million short and it all has to be made up ASAP. This, with the stock market up over 60% from the March '09 lows!

Be very careful putting too much trust in the words of the LLCs.
Anonymous said…
February 1, 2010 5:57 PM

Looks like they're well on their way to gradually working their way up to the 16% contributions to TCP-1 that was talked about during the transition. Oh my !! could it be another lie they told you. Can't wait I need another pay cut.
Anonymous said…
That's the problem with blogs. Cowards without a life and without any shame or self-respect can spout whatever they want without any supporting evidence whatsover.
Anonymous said…
Get your news straight from the reliable sources. NNSA and LLNS official news outlets are where it's at. Don't listen to any of these unofficial blogs.

Great things are happening at the NNSA labs. Join the team and help lead these labs to excellence. You can do it... NNSA and LLNS will be helping you all the way!
Anonymous said…
Please, give me a break already about how if you chose TCP1 expect employee contributions in the near future. There are NO plans for this now or in the near future. I am guessing the post came from someone who chose TCP2, since that is typically the case.
Anonymous said…
I see that some of the trolls from "LANL: The Rest of the Story" have migrated over here now that Doug has once again gone to ground.
Anonymous said…
"Great things are happening at the NNSA labs. Join the team "...
until you get old, then we fire you.
Anonymous said…
February 4, 2010 7:46 PM

I hope they take the excess of TCP-1'er are always braging about and use it to bail the state out of debt. I've already written sacramento and pointed them in the right direct.
Anonymous said…
If the UC retirement system was overfunded, you would have a case there since UC is tied to the state. Not the case with LLNS. It sounds like you may be bitter that TCP1 has not required employee contributions. My guess is that if UCRP were overfunded you would NOT be suggesting they use IT to bail out the state.
Anonymous said…
At least my raise covered half the cost I have to pay for the health insurance increase.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!