Skip to main content

Livermore:site of "technology gold rush?"

Wow!


http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_14420433?source=rss&nclick_check=1

Comments

Anonymous said…
Could this explain the politics for getting rid of the Pu. The good news is, it's time to jump ship, get better wages, benefits and bigger 401k contributions. Say goodbye to LLNL and onto people who appreciate you and will pay you commensurately. Take your ideas onto your new employer whoever that'll be.
Anonymous said…
I read this article and I don't get how NIF-related technologies are going to lead to more efficient automobiles or any green technology. What am I missing?
Anonymous said…
An iHub? I think I smell iPork.
Anonymous said…
February 17, 2010 10:24 PM

It's not for the NIF people it's for people like CM&S, HLS, Alternative Energy and Physics, rememeber them, the backbone of LLNL that's been neglected for decades.
Anonymous said…
Here's a story of an even bigger boondoggle (with link below) courtesy of the highly risk averse, bureaucratic loving employees over at Dr. Chu's DOE. If you know DOE HQ, then what you hear in this article will sound very familiar to you. In typical fashion, DOE is generating lots of paperwork requirements but showing little in the way of results:

latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/02/obama-stimulus-weatherization.html

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obama's federal government can weatherize your home for only $57,362 each (LA Times, Feb 18)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Anonymous said…
Arrgh me fellow pirates, thar be gold on the other side of that fence. We best be sharpening our pens to write proposals before the bacon is eaten up by others.

The base idea is to make this a campus atmosphere devoid of the security issues we encounter now. But if any of the expensive overhead is pushed over the fence, it will doom the project. Also, if this program is subsidized out of the lab's budget we'll see overhead rates jump again, driving sponsors for work inside the fence to look elsewhere, and not necessarily just a hop over the fence.

I see some potential good things to happen here, but given DOE/NNSA's record of imposing inane rules and regulations, it will probably fail.
Anonymous said…
The $57,000 Joke of 2010 How many of you can afford to put this much money into your home so maybe you'll get a $1,500 energy credit on your income tax. The RED tape to get a job done sounds very familiar.
Anonymous said…
"How many of you can afford to put this much money into your home so maybe you'll get a $1,500 energy credit on your income tax." - 2:09 pm

Yes, but just think of all the wonderful paper-pushing jobs created over at DOE with the $57,000 dollars in stimulus money expended on each house. Lovely!

Come to think of it, the energy expended in all the trees cut down to handle the paper forms required by DOE probably makes this venture a net energy loss.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!