Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Open campus

Anonymously contributed:

"Open campus" = no security threat. No Pu = no security threat. You need to understand that it was never about protecting employees, but protecting nuclear material. No nuclear material = no protection. You aren't that special. Get used to it.
By -

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/us/23brfs-NUCLEARCONVO_BRF.html?ref=todayspaper

11/23/2010 7:32 PM
Anonymous said...

Who really cares about the stupid open campus? I don't, it's just another way to waste money.

12/22/2010 5:35 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

LLNS Contract discussion

SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE

Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...

  • Trump is to gut the labs.
    The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the ...
  • Plutonium Shots on NIF.
    Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
  • Who is LLNS, and who controls it?
    Who is LLNS, and who controls it? From llnsllc.com Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC (LLNS) is managed by a board of governors, a ...