Skip to main content

DOE holds unique power to freeze contractor pay

Other agencies don't have the same authority!!
I thought we were employees of a private company. DOE still has power over us. We benefit neither from being a government employee nor a private sector employee!
We get the worst of both worlds! or is my perception distorted?


http://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2010/12/22/unique-arrangement-allows-doe-to-freeze-contractor-pay.aspx

Comments

Anonymous said…
What really gets me is that all the Executive Management at the Labs are still insulated from this freeze. If the DOE wants to save significant monies they need to change the rules and dig into these multilayered and deep Lab Executive pockets. Something is really wrong with this current arrangement, unless of course your Mikey, Paul, George, or Ringo!!
Anonymous said…
Let's review... at LANL we've had several years of little to no raises for the general technical staff, the new DOE promise of no raises until 2014 at the earliest, rising medical contributions by 30% this year and more to come for next year, plus salary contributions to the decaying TCP1 pension which are to rise to 8% of salary by early 2012.

Meanwhile, the top management has totally pig'ed out on inflated salaries and a juicy 20% bonus each year (which is protected from the DOE salary freeze!).

While most scientists hate unions, it would have been far better fo the remaining technical staff if they had unionized before the "for-profit" LLC take-over. Lab management and the DOE/NNSA have quickly learned that they can walk all over the non-unionized work force at their labs and will continue to do so with a vengeance.
Anonymous said…
It only gets better if you read the last e-mail that came out over the Christmas holidays. It appears the workers will not get a pay raise for two years, but upper level management and all those who normally get bonus checks will get theirs as normal for doing such a shit hot job.
Anonymous said…
Could it get even worse? Some bankrupt EU nations are starting to seize private pensions to cover massive government debts. Yikes!

***

"European nations begin seizing private pensions"
(Christian Science Monitor, Jan 4, 2011)

Hungary, Poland, and three other nations take over citizens' pension money to make up government budget shortfalls.

www.csmonitor.com/Business/
The-Adam-Smith-Institute-Blog/
2011/0102/European-nations-begin
-seizing-private-pensions
Anonymous said…
January 4, 2011 10:27 AM

They really need to start stringing pricks like this up on the nearest lamp post, letting them hang there with a note on their chest that says, "The next SOB that tries this will get the same thing" It's the only way to resolve such a delimma.
Anonymous said…
I am with Ok with being frozen temporarily. Compared to people who have been searching for employment or those who have had cuts, a freeze is ok.
what turns my stomach is the rhetoric that DOE/NNSA and Lab management repeat all the time:
for example: "we want to continue to retain and attract the best and the brightest"!
Ah! Ah!
1) we never did attract the best for a long time. Those who wait 3 or more months (a year in one case)(that is how long the hiring process takes at LLNL) cannot be that bright!
2) With a freeze, it is unlikely anyone will want to work here, unless they ask for a huge salary to start with.
Anonymous said…
Einstein knows that no one reads this blog.
Anonymous said…
NNSA/DOE's 4-step game plan for the labs:

Step 1. Freeze lab pay for many years to come.

Step 2. Freeze payments for retiree medical.

Step 3. Freeze any future payments for severance.

Step 4. Freeze the TCP1 pension and 401k match.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...