Skip to main content

New Livermore Lab director Albright starts job

Anonymously contributed:

New Livermore Lab director Albright starts job

San Francisco Business Times by Steven E.F. Brown
Date: Friday, December 2, 2011,

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory welcomed a new director, Penrose “Parney” Albright, on Thursday.

Albright started work as the 11th director of the Department of Energy laboratory, taking over from the retiring George Miller.

Besides being the lab’s director, Albright, a physicist, is president of Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, the group that manages the lab. LLNS is a team of businesses, including San Francisco-based Bechtel Corp., URS Corp., and the University of California.

In the past, Albright oversaw global security at Livermore Lab, which hired him in 2009. He also was president of Civitas Group LLC, which studies the United States’ defenses against terrorism.

He was Assistant Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security in the past.

Albright also designed an experiment that was carried into orbit on the Space Shuttle Discovery in 1991 on a Department of Defense mission.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory was started in 1952 by the University of California as a Cold War atomic weapons research center, building on the work started with the Manhattan Project. Since then, it has expanded into many other areas of research, including fusion energy (many methods, including the current laser ignited system), weather studies, and biomedicine.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm dropping this comment just give the impression that anyone cares about this dude.
Anonymous said…
Is it possible that the Board of Governors actually learned something by selecting the unknown Parney? By the apparent lack of interest in this guy versus the selections of Anastasio/McMillan, maybe so. We can only hope the "Livermore" legacy will die following McMillan. God save Los Alamos if Knapp becomes the next LANL Director because his plan would be to burn down the Laboratory, city, county and everyone in them.
Anonymous said…
Is it possible that the Board of Governors actually learned something by selecting the unknown Parney? By the apparent lack of interest in this guy versus the selections of Anastasio/McMillan, maybe so.

December 14, 2011 2:37 AM


The selection of Parney may have been in part in response to the reaction to the LANL process.
Anonymous said…
Is it possible that the Board of Governors actually learned something by selecting the unknown Parney? By the apparent lack of interest in this guy versus the selections of Anastasio/McMillan, maybe so.

December 14, 2011 2:37 AM


The selection of Parney may have been in part in response to the reaction to the LANL process.
Anonymous said…
The selection of Parney may have been in part in response to the reaction to the LANL process.

December 14, 2011 8:16 AM


That, and the very different backgrounds of the two. Parney is broad and has indicated that he desires to have LLNL be more than just a weapons design Lab.
Anonymous said…
The selection of Parney may have been in part in response to the reaction to the LANL process.

December 14, 2011 8:16 AM


Don't forget that LLNL and DHS have a special bond going back to the earliest days. Parney was involved in those discussions.
Anonymous said…
Don't forget that LLNL and DHS have a special bond going back to the earliest days. Parney was involved in those discussions.

December 14, 2011 12:49 PM

That's a good thing because the DoD hates Livermore. Especially the Navy (i.e. Strategic Systems Program Office). Did you guys (LLNL) ever wonder why you have no Navy Systems? That is, REAL Navy systems, not toys.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!