Skip to main content

NIF TO TAKE A 20 MILLION DOLLAR HIT FOR 2013!

Anonymously contributed (in all CAPS)

NIF TO TAKE A 20 MILLION DOLLAR HIT FOR 2013 PLUS DOE TOLD NIF NO MORE SUCKING MONEY FROM OTHER PROGRAMS!
THIS TRANSLATES TO 100 OR 200 EMPLOYEES TO BE CUT FROM NIF. BUT ULM WANTS TO DISTRIBUTE THE CUTS ACROSS THE LAB.

Comments

thief said…
20 million? Crap..... there goes Eds landscaping budget!
Anonymous said…
Regardless of whether NIF achieves fame for its scientific achievements, it has already set records for creative financing, putting ENRON and others to shame.

Expect this to continue. Although NIF will supposedly pay its fair share in FY13, the Lab, with DOE's blessing, will adjust the payout rates so NIF receives additional funding.
Anonymous said…
Regardless of whether NIF achieves fame for its scientific achievements, it has already set records for creative financing, putting ENRON and others to shame.

Expect this to continue. Although NIF will supposedly pay its fair share in FY13, the Lab, with DOE's blessing, will adjust the payout rates so NIF receives additional funding.
Anonymous said…
The only thing we have gotten from NIF are Bay Area "brown-outs" when they fire it.
Anonymous said…
The only thing we have gotten from NIF are Bay Area "brown-outs" when they fire it.

No such thing. Get real.
Anonymous said…
What's your source for this pronouncement? Give us more than just a topic title please.
Anonymous said…
Here's what's wrong with the U.S. Let's can CMRR and keep pouring money down the NIF pit!
Anonymous said…
It is a good thing that our competitors, Russia and China do not seriously threaten our interests.
Anonymous said…
To the original poster, please post the source of your information... is this just speculation or a hard fact??

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!