Skip to main content

Here are the performance reports

Anonymously contributed:

An article in the ABQ journal. Finally NNSA has released the performance reports.
here are the links:

http://www.nukewatch.org/

LANL documents reveal problems

Comments

Anonymous said…
-----------------------------------
LANL Report:

In the most recent review of the lab’s performance, dated Dec. 6, the NNSA slashed the performance bonus paid to the lab’s managers, arguing they had failed to meet the agency’s requirements for “ahead of schedule performance” on the project, which the lab had said earlier would be operational by 2011.

It is partially occupied, but equipment installation for the laboratory space is ongoing. The lab’s management team, led by corporate giant Bechtel and the University of California, had claimed it was entitled to a $700,000 performance bonus for its work on the office building and lab, but NNSA only agreed to $176,000.
----------------------------------

Gotta love watching the Bechtel pigs at the top of the LLC's "for-profit" management chain secretly fighting for their executive bonus loot while the hard working employees who do the hard lifting to met these PBIs get.... NOTHING!!!!
Anonymous said…
This article sure did pull NNSA's pants down. They have been "protecting" LANS SEM incompetence. NNSA knows they made Frankenstein (aka LANL/LLNS) and if Frankie goes down, NNSA will go down with him.
Anonymous said…
LANL report

I see LDRD gets a negative ranking. What for it did not say.
Anonymous said…
NNSA hates the LDRD program. They see it as robbery of their funds. You can thank St. Pete for protecting it while he was in office. His legacy lasts awhile longer.

If NNSA thought they could kill it off, they would do so immediately. They may try again to end it at some later date.
Anonymous said…
Comments here went from 4 to 3 last night, Then back to 4 today. Scooby's censorship button at work, without explanation or reason, as usual. His "editorial" attention is killing the free expression of ideas and feelings on this blog. No posts I've seen cross his "rules" stated on the front page. Scooby. just go away already. (Here comes the "don't let the door hit you..." reply.)
Anonymous said…
His "editorial" attention is killing the free expression of ideas and feelings on this blog.

People seem to be expressing themselves fine enough. Not like this blog has stalled like the already-moribund LANL VSP blog.
Anonymous said…
People seem to be expressing themselves fine enough. Not like this blog has stalled like the already-moribund LANL VSP blog.

April 6, 2012 8:28 PM

This is the LANL Blog. We thought we would move in just like Anastasio, McMillan, and King Knapp moved into our house. Thanks for the accommodations, the pajamas, robe, newspaper, couch, dog, bed, and Blog are great!
Anonymous said…
LDRD is not a fair process. There are ideas that the laboratory should fund for further investment. But LDRD has become social welfare for scientist and people are help their "friends", which is against policy of the labs. get the funding, rather than looking at the best ideas. This is simply wrong and hurting our country to increase scientific knowledge.
Anonymous said…
"LDRD is not a fair process. "

How is not fair process? I thought the AD's pick what they want. The rest is competed with like a 8% success rate.

10:34 AM seems a little early to be drunk but that is your choice.
Anonymous said…
10:34 AM seems a little early to be drunk but that is your choice.

April 7, 2012 7:03 PM

Really?? Did you absolutely have to include that last part?? You are what's wrong with our society. Can't disagree without being disagreeable. Sad.
Anonymous said…
7:03 --- Keep believing .... AD + friends with AD = LDRD funding. I am sure that this is not always the case.. But I have seen it so much. There are some honest AD and some not honest AD.
Anonymous said…
Concerning their evaluation of LDRD, the guys at the NNSA again demonstrate their fundamental cluelessness and technical incompetence. On the same page, they claim that science performance was good, but LDRD was bad. Yet, the science performance they praise is predominately supported by the LDRD funds. What funding source is supporting the vast majority of those publications they cite? It's pretty simple cause and effect.

Imagine the CEO of Intel coming out saying, "We make excellent processors. I'm real pleased with that. But why again are we wasting all this money on chip design?"

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!