Anonymously contributed:
------------------------------------------
Grasping the Secrity Problems at Y12
------------------------------------------
There were so many problems that contributed to the July 28 security breach at the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant that the Inspector General had to lump them into categories just to keep them organized.
Some things in the investigation report released Friday were almost incredible. For instance:
In the predawn morning, after three Plowshares protesters had cut through security fences and entered the Protected Area without resistance, the activists hung banners, spray-painted messages, and used a hammer to bang against a wall of the plant's uranium storage facility. Inside the fortress-like facility, security guards just assumed the noise was coming from maintenance workers.
Guards later told investigators they often weren't told about scheduled maintenance. They said it wasn't unusual for workers to just show up -- even in the dark, without warning -- in the high-security area.
Y-12's highly touted security system failed at multiple levels, according to the damning, 18-page "Special Report" by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Inspector General.
"We identified troubling displays of ineptitude in responding to alarms, failures to maintain critical security equipment, over reliance on compensatory measures, misunderstanding of security protocols, poor communications, and weaknesses in contract management," Inspector General Gregory Friedman wrote.
Some problems identified by investigators were too sensitive to include in the publicly released report and were shared with federal officials privately.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://blogs.knoxnews.com/munger/2012/08/grasping-the-security-problems.html
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
http://blogs.knoxnews.com/munger/2012/08/grasping-the-security-problems.html
August 31, 2012 5:11 PM
Inbreeding personified:
AB Analyst(Security & Safeguard Div)
EDUCATION & EXPERIENCE:
1. Bachelor’s degree in engineering,
2. or other related science or equivalent combination of related education and experience,
3. with a least 6 years of experience in Authorization Basis,
4. or 6 years of experience in Safeguards and Security at the programmatic level.
LOL...From BSE to 6 yrs on the guard force.
No, they didn't fill it with an engineer - A security grunt from the guard force got it.
results on a performance test may have been compromised as two protective force
personnel were inappropriately permitted to view the computer simulations of four
scenarios on the test. In addition, we were provided information that inappropriate
actions had occurred going back to the mid-1980s in connection with performance tests at
the Department's Oak Ridge complex."
Why pick on Y-12? This practice has been going on at PX for several years.
results on a performance test may have been compromised as two protective force
personnel were inappropriately permitted to view the computer simulations of four
scenarios on the test. In addition, we were provided information that inappropriate
actions had occurred going back to the mid-1980s in connection with performance tests at
the Department's Oak Ridge complex."
Why pick on Y-12? This practice has been going on at PX for several years.
results on a performance test may have been compromised as two protective force
personnel were inappropriately permitted to view the computer simulations of four
scenarios on the test. In addition, we were provided information that inappropriate
actions had occurred going back to the mid-1980s in connection with performance tests at
the Department's Oak Ridge complex."
Why pick on Y-12? This practice has been going on at PX for several years.
That should teach them!
That should teach them!