Skip to main content

Lab admits violating nuke waste permit

Saturday, July 5, 2014 at 8:36 am

Monitor Staff, Wire Reports

Los Alamos National Laboratory says it made mistakes in packing waste that has been linked to a radiation leak at the government's underground nuclear waste dump, but it remains unclear if the violations or its use of organic cat litter to absorb moisture played a role in the accident.

In a letter released by state regulators Thursday, lab officials told the New Mexico Environment Department that their internal probe of the handling of the toxic waste from decades of nuclear bomb building has uncovered several violations of its Hazardous Waste Facility Permit. The lab says it failed to follow proper procedures in making the switch from inorganic to organic litter and in its lack of follow up on waste that tests showed to be highly acidic.

http://www.lamonitor.com/content/lab-admits-violating-nuke-waste-permit

Comments

Anonymous said…
The Los Alamos Monitor is reporting that about 100 LANL subcontractors involved with the packaging of WIPP waste have recently been laid off. The money used to support them will now be send to WIPP for the clean up efforts. Even worse, the state of New Mexico will soon begin levying heavy fines against LANL for the delays in the promised cleanup efforts at LANL. And yet, with all this failure, Charlie McMillan remains.

At the very least, perhaps he should be asked to forfeit his 2 million dollar per year salary to the WIPP cleanup effort. The employees he overseas on the TCP1 pension have already seen $120 million in "rainy day" funding at NNSA go up in smoke as it is transferred to the WIPP cleanup efforts. Care to chip in, Charlie?


Anonymous said…
I have to admit that I'm surprised at how little government attention this is getting. In the UC days, DOE, NNSA, and congress would all have been in quite a snit.
Anonymous said…
It is taking awhile for the news media to catch wind of this one, it is gonna be big. This will be right in front of LANL's face until WIIP is reopeaned, maybe in the next 4-5 years.
It will be fun to watch LANS squirm for the foreseeable future.
Anonymous said…
It is taking awhile for the news media to catch wind of this one, it is gonna be big. This will be right in front of LANL's face until WIIP is reopeaned, maybe in the next 4-5 years.
It will be fun to watch LANS squirm for the foreseeable future.
Anonymous said…
It is taking awhile for the news media to catch wind of this one, it is gonna be big. This will be right in front of LANL's face until WIIP is reopeaned, maybe in the next 4-5 years.
It will be fun to watch LANS squirm for the foreseeable future.
Anonymous said…
It ironical that the one area (Transuranic Program) that LANS was paying the least attention to is the one that bit them in the ass. Ouch! LANS got arrogant and assumed that "the boys" they hired from Savannah River Site (SRS) knew what they were doing. By the way the only nuclear facility (WETF, PF-4, TRU, RLW) at LANL that is OPERATIONAL is the RLW program. Outta boy LANS, hecka of job!
Anonymous said…
At the very least, perhaps he should be asked to forfeit his 2 million dollar per year salary to the WIPP cleanup effort. The employees he overseas on the TCP1 pension have already seen $120 million in "rainy day" funding at NNSA go up in smoke as it is transferred to the WIPP cleanup efforts. Care to chip in, Charlie?

July 9, 2014 at 10:39 PM

Sure, here is a 1/4 of my Southwest Airline points used to visit my friends "at Livermore". Use them wisely buddy!
Anonymous said…
At the very least, perhaps he should be asked to forfeit his 2 million dollar per year salary to the WIPP cleanup effort. The employees he overseas on the TCP1 pension have already seen $120 million in "rainy day" funding at NNSA go up in smoke as it is transferred to the WIPP cleanup efforts.

July 9, 2014 at 10:39 PM

1. Provide evidence citing a $2M salary.

2. Provide evidence that LANL employees ever had any interest in or right to the DOE/NNSA pension monies involved in the WIPP issue.

3. Or just STFU.
Anonymous said…
1. While the base salary of the "lab director" likely is well below $2M per year, the total compensation probably is higher than that number. When all the standard items are included such as bonus, deferred compensation, above grade benefits, and funds from related job functions such as "president", it is useless to look at the base salary number. In the present case at LANL, it could be a bit lower, since Charlie might not have been a hard negotiator.

2. As reported in the press, the funds were for all of the NNSA M&O sites that had defined benefit plans. That covers pre-transition LLNL and LANL. So, the funds may not have come entirely from LANL TCP-1. In any event, the make up funds from NNSA were needed some years due to poor stock market performance. Since the markets are doing very well this year, the monies may not have been needed.

So, in a way, both 10:39 PM and 9:28 PM are each partly correct.
Anonymous said…
1. Those who insist on calculating Charlie's salary that way need to use the same logic in calculating their own.

2. DOE/NNSA has no control over the funds dedicated to the contractors' Defined Benefit Plans. Pre-transition pension funds for LLNL and LANL were completely under UC control. So the "press" got it wrong.
Anonymous said…
10:52 AM is a funny poster!

1. Sure, no problem. Only, the average employee will enter zeros for all the other categories and their salary is their total compensation.

2. Wow! If what you say is correct, then NNSA has put no funds into TCP-1 since transition. That would be a new story.
Anonymous said…
July 10, 2014 at 9:28 PM needs to sign his/her name to get full suck-up points from Charlie. He/her should do this soon, since Charlie may not be around much longer.
Anonymous said…
I find this constant harping on Charlie McMillan rather childish. I don't give a hoot if he has Italian belts, colors his hair or gets 2M$.

He is not the problem, you can put anybody at the helm of LANS, and it will be the same story. The corporate interests of our companies are what is driving the madness, not Charlie.

To me it is the same as blaming Obama or before George W for any ailments, even bad weather.
Anonymous said…
He is not the problem, you can put anybody at the helm of LANS, and it will be the same story. The corporate interests of our companies are what is driving the madness, not Charlie.

July 12, 2014 at 6:29 AM

Agreed, but, McMillan is in-charge, the commander-in-chief, el heffe, comprende?
Anonymous said…
McMillan is in-charge, the commander-in-chief, el heffe, comprende?

July 12, 2014 at 8:01 AM

You are very naive. The LANS Board is in charge. Mcmillan is a figurehead "President." The political and corporate dynamic on the Board controls everything that happens at LANL.
Anonymous said…
You are very naive. The LANS Board is in charge. Mcmillan is a figurehead "President." The political and corporate dynamic on the Board controls everything that happens at LANL.

July 12, 2014 at 8:15 AM

Ha ha ha... Norm Pattiz and crew? The only thing Norm is worried about now is how many pair of silk Venticinque ties he's buying on Rodeo Drive this morning. Norm can't even spell "nuclear" let alone pronounce it.
Anonymous said…
The only thing Norm is worried about now is how many pair of silk Venticinque ties


Here we go again.....

Give us all a break, save up some money and buy all the things you don't like other people to have.
Anonymous said…
"He is not the problem, you can put anybody at the helm of LANS, and it will be the same story. The corporate interests of our companies are what is driving the madness, not Charlie."

You are partially right but the person who could help the most is Charlie. The corporation knows this and that is why has his paid enough money to go along with it. In a way it is like a bribe. I would guess most of the upper management know that what a disaster the contract change has been but the money is too good to speak up against what is happening.
Anonymous said…
Ha ha ha... Norm Pattiz and crew?

July 12, 2014 at 8:25 AM

Nope. Albert, Drell, Mies, Cochran...Lots of heavy hitters there.
Anonymous said…
The NNSA labs have become a soul-sucking disaster for most employees since the LLCs took over and this will not change no matter how many official reports are produced documenting this mess.

You can't change the broken management culture. The easier solution is to simply leave the lab as soon as possible to salvage your sanity. Begin looking for better opportunities as the economy continues to improve. What price for your sanity?
Anonymous said…
Nope. Albert, Drell, Mies, Cochran...Lots of heavy hitters there.

July 12, 2014 at 1:00 PM

A bunch of ole farts being rolled-in on wheel chairs.
Anonymous said…
Sid Drell? Isn't he at an Palo Alto ole-folks home eating crackers and soup?
Anonymous said…
Drell is a well known anti nuke activist. He has accomplished much of his pacifist agenda through the LANS/LLNS board of governers by disabling the labs and putting incompetent people in top spots.
Anonymous said…
Drell is a well known anti nuke activist. He has accomplished much of his pacifist agenda through the LANS/LLNS board of governers by disabling the labs and putting incompetent people in top spots.

July 13, 2014 at 6:32 PM


Besides McMillan, who else incompetent has been put in a top spot?
Anonymous said…
You don't really work here, do you?
Anonymous said…
Yeah, denigrate the questioner, instead of answering the question. Real classy.
Anonymous said…
Besides McMillan, who else incompetent has been put in a top spot?

July 14, 2014 at 8:11 AM

Is Nick Salazar, NM Sate Senator still on the LANS Board? This guy is so old that his constituents are trying to run him off. LANS is just using this guy for "window dressing" diversity on the Board. As soon as I saw his name as a Board member, I knew the Board itself was a "sham". By the way, LANS still has this guy employed at LANL.
Anonymous said…
Nick Salazar cant spell WIIP, much less understand any of the issues, he is a very old politician, that LANL has used to their benefit for many years, As has been said before the Board is not credible.
Anonymous said…
Anonymous said...
Yeah, denigrate the questioner, instead of answering the question. Real classy.

July 14, 2014 at 8:44 PM

That was the answer. Get it?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!