Skip to main content

Retraction

Image
By scooby
Retraction of journal article authored by (now) Sandia postdoc:

http://retractionwatch.com/2014/02/25/inconsistent-errors-and-unknowing-authors-force-retraction-of-microbiology-paper/

There are also rumors of plagiarism of a paper authored by another Sandia researcher in the Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is a problem not just at Sandia but at other national labs, including the other weapons labs, and universities. I know because I am a referee for Physical Review and I have caught such people. Nature and Science magazines have discussed these issues.
9/01/2014 5:54 PM
Anonymous said…
Regarding the previous post about the Sandia plagiarism in the Journal of Physical Chemistry C:

Apparently this was brought up in a meeting the other day, and an ongoing investigation of the first 2 authors is underway.
9/02/2014 11:26 AM
Anonymous said…
I'm sure these authors must have something to do with the Chili cookoff that involved no chili.
9/02/2014 12:15 PM
Anonymous said…
Not unusual for a institution that does not have an ethics board maybe Jennifer Szutu is in charge of that too.
9/03/2014 10:32 AM
Anonymous said…
So one co-author forced a retraction, why wasn't this done with Lindl's papergate publication?
9/05/2014 6:45 AM
Anonymous said…
Don't know why you are guys are worried about Sandia, when LLNL takes the cake in large-scale dishonesty.

Haven't you read the last few NIF articles?

Hot spot ignition!!!! Oh wait....
9/15/2014 8:35 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more