Skip to main content

Ellen Pao lawsuit is going to have an impact on LLNL staff relations.

I think the recent Ellen Pao lawsuit is going to have an impact on LLNL staff relations.

http://recode.net/2015/03/06/women-outperformed-men-and-a-sexual-predator-was-on-the-loose-kleiner-perkins-investigator-opens-up/

Staff relations has a history of blaming the victim and easing out employees who are victims of retaliation or seen as "problems" by the management. Management also has a history of making highly personal attacks on performance appraisals that have no relevance to actual performance. That isn't working in the Ellen Pao case. Of course at the lab, management "picks the winners" and pushes down those it doesn't like. This highly subjective criterion doesn't play well in the courtroom.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This thread can disappear now - it's over, and Pao lost.
Anonymous said…
Does the real world ever affect the culture of the Labs?
Anonymous said…
Sorry to say, I can imagine that the Ellen Pao lawsuit is going to put a big damper on high powered firms hiring women who don't previously have a strong work experience and reputation. Bad for new women grads.
Anonymous said…
Self-absorbed, arrogant, pain-in-the-ass people are never fun to work with, women or men. Pao is the poster child. Listen to the juror comments.
Anonymous said…
" Self-absorbed, arrogant, pain-in-the-ass people are never fun to work with, women or men."

However they are the ones that get the attention and get it done. The modern world is about getting other people to pay attention to you and that is all there is to it.
Anonymous said…
The modern world is about getting other people to pay attention to you and that is all there is to it.

March 29, 2015 at 7:38 PM

In case you missed it, Pao learned just the opposite. But just go on ignoring reality, it seems to work for you.
Anonymous said…
Being likable is a big factor anywhere. It's clear that Pao didn't have this. At Livermore I have seen unqualified people promoted into upper management because they went to an Ivy League school and everyone thought they were smart, regardless of the evidence. Sometimes these people had no peer reviewed articles or had even falsified their work. People's opinion of you matters.
Anonymous said…
Reputation is everything. By having an affair with a married, male colleague, who was subsequently fired for making sexual advances towards a second female colleague, I think Ms. Pao lost all creditability in the eyes of the jury. Even if her case had some merit. You can't say "I loved him" and slept with him willingly, then sue to company.
Anonymous said…
Interesting article, although somewhat black and white

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/03/30/thankyouellenpao-only-if-you-like-bullying-vexatious-opportunists/

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.