Skip to main content

Beth Sellers anniversary

Beth Sellers anniversary

Charlie needs to pass out some awards for ethical behavior to mark the date.

http://www.abqjournal.com/364443/abqnewsseeker/deputy-director-of-los-alamos-national-laboratory-resigns-over-conflict-of-interest-in-consulting-contract.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
Before the Bechtel bashing crowd jumps on this thread, just remember that Sellers was a personal hire by McMillan and did not come from Bechtel.
Anonymous said…

But she works for Bechtel now!
Anonymous said…
Sellers was hired by Bechtel pre-LANL but specifically for an assignment somewhere on one of the Bechtel M&O contracts. Technically McMillan did not hire her because the Deputy position at LANL is filled by Bechtel. But he did interview her and agreed to her selection.
Anonymous said…
Sellers was hired by Bechtel pre-LANL but specifically for an assignment somewhere on one of the Bechtel M&O contracts. Technically McMillan did not hire her because the Deputy position at LANL is filled by Bechtel. But he did interview her and agreed to her selection.

March 9, 2016 at 5:58 AM


That is not the story that McMillan bragged about at the time. Someone needs to get the story straight.


Anonymous said…
She is retired.
Anonymous said…
She is retired.

March 13, 2016 at 6:54 AM


But not before she was debarred from government contracting for the LANL breaches that Charlie was aware of and covered up for several years.
Anonymous said…
She was hired for LANL and retired after LANL.
Anonymous said…
She was:

DOE 14 years
AREVA 1 year
LANL 2.5 years
Bechtel 1 year and retired

Sound familiar?

Rich Marquez:

DOE 18 years
Burns and Roe 3 years
LANL 14 years


Bad habits learned at the DOE and allowed at LANL????

Anonymous said…
Rich Marquez:

DOE 18 years
Burns and Roe 3 years
LANL 14 years
Federal Prison ?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...