Excellent summary of what led to the WIPP waste explosion
"...the lab’s belief in its own “exceptionalism” is the problem and that LANL feels it doesn’t have to follow DOE rules."
http://www.abqjournal.com/744791/news/los-alamos-lab-officials-outline-safety-program.html
"...the lab’s belief in its own “exceptionalism” is the problem and that LANL feels it doesn’t have to follow DOE rules."
http://www.abqjournal.com/744791/news/los-alamos-lab-officials-outline-safety-program.html
Comments
Thou shall not get caught....?
In the end,the comedy of errors led to Moniz's decision to call an end to the failed LANS, LLC contract experiment. The LANS Board knows all of this but has no effective way to hold Bechtel accountable. Yes, several top managers were reassigned but they were only pawns.
Wallace never defended the WIPP operations that led to this debacle. Nor should he. But he did try to insist that the chemical and biological bases for the incident should be thoroughly understood since the multiple reviews indicate systemic failings across the board, including the National TRU Program and management of its waste acceptance criteria.
An irony is that the LANL barrel was where it should have been--deep underground in a salt repository. In fact, had the particular panel been closed on schedule as it should, there would have been no news here. You really can't make up all of the separate contributing causes to the WIPP incident. But you can always count on Bechtel being in business development mode and never owning their deficiencies.
1. The new contract brings many new unfunded mandates. This ultimately leads to layoffs to fund the mandated work.
2. Contract Labor contacts will be terminated. New ones will be brought to competitive market. Contract employees will lose all accrued benefits not taken.
3. Employee benefits will be pushed toward markets with much lower benefits. Employee total compensation will fall.
4. Termination efforts and loss of morale means work effort and output will drop dramatically as the termination approaches.
5.Employee and family stress will rise.
6. Satifaction with work content diminishes.
7. Employee and Supervisor working condition agreements are terminated.
8. Employee work history is forgotten. A new gradebook is started.
9. Hiring stops and becomes harder as it is resumed.
10. At least 2 major reorganizations will occur. The first by senior managers vying for work scope prior to the termination. The second, after the new contractors is aboard. The third when new management begins to understand the work.
8. New management will not have experience in this work. Hence they will blunder over and over as they learn again.
So what can you do? I can only say brace for a rocky ride. Expect nothing from your elected representatives. Trust nothing from NNSA or your management. Have a new job offer in hand. Perhaps form an employee senate ( union?) to represent employee interests ib this.
LLNL
1990s - 2010s
Unusual? Yes. Helpful?
Here is a summary of the high points:
LANL good.
Bechtel bad.
March 29, 2016 at 1:39 PM
Denial, denial, denial, that is LANL for you. My hate for LANL knows no bound. For the past 22 years I have waited for the demise of LANL. I have been teased every few years that it will be closed or the culture of arrogance will be brought to its knees.. Yet it remains, a testament to the extraordinary depths of those that will cling to the culture to the end. This has not been fair to me or many others. No matter how many times the truth is presented, you still come back with your arrogance. When will it ever end?
March 30, 2016 at 12:45 AM
When you finally shut up?
In fact your hate speech about PhDs is prejudice. You could just as well be posting to Black Lives Matter about how you hate black people.
March 29, 2016 at 1:39 PM
Only if one considers paid propaganda "interesting information."
Check your arrogance, you are on you propaganda box again. I notice with all you types that you can write these long diatribes rationallizing how LANL is good Bechtel is bad but you can never except your responsibility, arrogance, and culture as being the root cause to the problem. To deny there s a cultural problem is rationalization and accepting there is a cultural problem is the first of many many steps in the long road to some kind of recovery.
Blah, blah. Thanks for sharing.
March 31, 2016 at 2:29 PM
Please, please at least attempt to read what you type before posting.
Please, please at least attempt to read what you type before posting.
April 1, 2016 at 8:30 AM
Grammar aside the poster has a point.
Not really a grammar problem either, just one mistyped word. Sheesh. Cut the guy a break, already.
April 1, 2016 at 8:36 PM
Sure hope you aren't ever in charge of anything that depends on careful reading. Try one more time to read it, and this time pay attention.
Sure hope you aren't ever in charge of anything that depends on careful reading. Try one more time to read it, and this time pay attention.
April 2, 2016 at 8:26 AM
What is your point? The idea of LANL having a single culture is obviously nonsense which is what the original poster was saying. Is here some other message or is this something that you just disagree with?
April 2, 2016 at 1:42 PM
You are right, it is a pretty picayune point. About as important as the difference between "an organic" and "inorganic" was to LANL. When you are part of a culture that carefully reads documents, then you notice such mistakes. Otherwise, you incorrectly fill a waste drum, ship it to WIPP, and when it explodes the entire place is shut down for an indefinite duration.
April 3, 2016 at 7:17 PM
You think that the entire episode is a hoax?
April 4, 2016 at 9:12 AM
No. Excess internal pressure popped the lid seal - not even enough to remove it completely. Clearly depicted in the photos released. Hardly an "explosion." Just more hyperventilating hyperbole.
April 4, 2016 at 9:12 AM
It was not an explosion.
April 4, 2016 at 11:32 AM
Indeed and that is why we need make science a priority rather than profit. I know this is not what you want to hear but it is the truth.
April 4, 2016 at 11:58 AM
It must be hard for some people to understand, but priorities in all organizations flow from the leadership. LANL is led by a PhD physicist that was selected by the University of California, with its rich scientific history. Plain and simple, what has happened at LANL is not the fault of profit or non-profit, it is the fault of the unqualified leadership.
Indeed but what does this have to do with a science culture? It may be a bad management culture but it is not a science culture that is the problem at LANL. Also before 2000 the leadership
seemed to work fine? What changed since 2000, it would be the push for a corporate like management structure, so I would have to see it is still driven by the for profit model that leads to unqualified leadership. Again this is not what you want to hear but you have your agenda and no amount of reasoning will ever work with you.
April 4, 2016 at 2:36 PM
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into." - Jonathan Swift.
I have to disagree with this on several points. The vast majority of the staff and LLNL and LANL believe that the for profit model has significantly eroded the the capabilities and functionality of the labs. The lab Directors must operate under this model which severally restrains what they can do and the fact that they have such high salaries now ensures that they will tow the line. Miller oversaw the RIF, Albright lasted two years, Goldstein is one of the better ones for sure but there is only so much he can do. One thing I will agree with you on is that McMillian is very weak but he alone is not the sole reasons for the LANL misshapes. WIPP, and the electrical accident at LANL where much more to do with the corporate culture. The other things like the slow progress on construction again are due corporate practices of maximizing profit. McMillian could have pushed back at any point on this but he knows who his master is and is very well compensated for it.
In many ways McMillian has been perfect for LANS. One thing that people seem to forget is how much the corporate partners leverage the contract to make additional profit. This comes in through rotating people through the labs and having subsidiary companies getting preferences through external contracts.