Skip to main content

UC Regents sexual harassment news

Image
By scooby
COMMENTS
Anonymous Anonymous said...
How and why is this related or relevant to LLNL?

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think the question of why does this affect LLNL is valid. After all, UC washed its hands of the employees when we shifted to LLNS. Does UC count Livermore as a campus anymore?
3/02/2017 5:42 PM
Anonymous said…
"Sex harassment at University of California: Janitors exposed, professors shielded"

"But a haphazard practice of redacting information exposed the names of some low-profile workers while sometimes shielding executives and professors, who investigators found sexually harassed students or coworkers."

http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/03/03/sexual-misconduct-at-university-of-california-janitors-exposed-professors-shielded/
3/06/2017 6:45 AM
Unknown said…
play asian game pokers online real money with sexy girl !!
and get a free chips pokers more than $100 for new member. register here !!!

hoyapoker
bungaqq
onebetqq
wongpoker
dinastipoker
3/13/2017 9:56 PM
Anonymous said…
This sexy girl poker thing deserves its own thread.
3/14/2017 7:13 PM
Anonymous said…
Oh my god we've been hacked by the Russians !!! Encouraging poker with Asian women working at UC ! Oh my god !
3/14/2017 11:46 PM
Anonymous said…
"Sex harassment at University of California: Janitors exposed, professors shielded"

Poor Janitor ! Can't even have that exciting calendar hidden in his/her broom closet. How else can he/she keep interest in his/her job.

Unfortunately, us "professionals" had to give these up 30 yrs ago. I still remember the "gay" guy with his "working mans" calendar. It was great ! Nobody said anything since he was a great friend to the group.
4/14/2017 11:31 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

tcp1 looking good

By scooby
I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
105 comments
Read more