Skip to main content

Town out of growth?

Image
By scooby
Headline story in yesterday's Los Alamos paper was about the bank laying off 10% of their workforce. Does this combine with number of local businesses closing indicate that the town is running out of growth? 

Comments

Anonymous said…
If you read the article, and understand the context, this was an expected consequence of previous poor decisions. The bank ran into very serious trouble a few years back with federal regulators for numerous improper activities. The bank is owned by a private company and the board of directors of that company was not doing a good job of oversight on the bank officers, and the feds caught them out. Look at the new president, who came after the prior one was fired and see that the bank was forced to hire a lot of staff to comply with the federal requirements. Maybe the directors had a choice to close the doors and face potential trials, but in any event many of those staff that were hired to address the issues are now being let go. It was all avoidable if the directors had had a competent audit committee, but they obviously did not and the feds put a stop to the irregularities.
10/20/2017 9:49 AM
Anonymous said…
It's always been a one-horse town.
10/22/2017 6:13 PM
Anonymous said…
Of course it has. Everyone knows that. So what?
10/25/2017 8:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more