This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Monday, January 29, 2018
LANSLLNS Management Salaries and Bonuses
Correcting for COLAs, how much did LANSLLNS management salaries from Supervisors and above go up as a percentage compared to the pre-LANSLLNS period? What is a typical LANSLLNS manager "bonus" referenced to their respective base salaries, 5%, 20%, other?
4 comments:
Anonymous
said...
There is nothing inherently wrong with above package raises and bonuses to reward employee performance. When those raises and bonuses are not disclosed though, the risk of conflict of interest conduct and gift related expectations can become a workplace problem. For-profit contractors with national and international interests permitted to dole out secret salaries and bonuses to employees undermines DOE "good security practices". Publicly disclosed performance based salary increases and bonuses are reasonable. Undisclosed salary increases and bonuses open the door to bribery, collusion, and hush money, all DOE contractor No-Nos.
"I liked it when UC was forced to publicly list the salaries of everyone at LLNL and LANL. Transparency is a good thing."
Has SPSE made an attempt to have LLNS salaries and bonuses publicly disclosed as they did with UC/LLNL? The "we are a private company so we don't need to release such information" argument doesn't seem to be supportable in DOE contractor space.
Employees doing the bidding for LANSLLNS with the understanding they will receive large bonuses and large pay raises in secret for doing so? Couldn't happen. Employees aren't allowed to be bought off. It says as much in the security refresher right?
4 comments:
There is nothing inherently wrong with above package raises and bonuses to reward employee performance. When those raises and bonuses are not disclosed though, the risk of conflict of interest conduct and gift related expectations can become a workplace problem. For-profit contractors with national and international interests permitted to dole out secret salaries and bonuses to employees undermines DOE "good security practices". Publicly disclosed performance based salary increases and bonuses are reasonable. Undisclosed salary increases and bonuses open the door to bribery, collusion, and hush money, all DOE contractor No-Nos.
I liked it when UC was forced to publicly list the salaries of everyone at LLNL and LANL.
Transparency is a good thing.
"I liked it when UC was forced to publicly list the salaries of everyone at LLNL and LANL. Transparency is a good thing."
Has SPSE made an attempt to have LLNS salaries and bonuses publicly disclosed as they did with UC/LLNL? The "we are a private company so we don't need to release such information" argument doesn't seem to be supportable in DOE contractor space.
Employees doing the bidding for LANSLLNS with the understanding they will receive large bonuses and large pay raises in secret for doing so? Couldn't happen. Employees aren't allowed to be bought off. It says as much in the security refresher right?
Post a Comment