Skip to main content

Safety failures

Two more recent safety failures at LANL disclosed by DNFSB

What will Wallace and the UC team have to say about these?


http://www.lamonitor.com/content/lanl-struggles-fission-materials-issues-march

Comments

Anonymous said…
Ah, yes. Just like a bad penny, the DNFSB shows up again and again, adding no value whatsoever.
Anonymous said…
Shooting the messenger has no impact on the message that the UC has failed in LANL leadership. Putting a geologist and his pack of followers in charge is only the latest failure. More radiation safety failures will happen under these conditions and will come to light. The question is will NNSA be able to install a new operations contractor before another major event happens.
Anonymous said…
April 15, 2018 at 4:57 AM

"will NNSA be able to install a new operations contractor before another major event happens"
----------------------

And this will help how? Still the same group of incompetent managers with a new leader.
Anonymous said…
Shooting the messenger has no impact on the message that the UC has failed in LANL leadership. Putting a geologist and his pack of followers in charge is only the latest failure. More radiation safety failures will happen under these conditions and will come to light. The question is will NNSA be able to install a new operations contractor before another major event happens.

April 15, 2018 at 4:57 AM

Bechtel is one to blame for this.
Anonymous said…
April 15, 2018 at 10:18 AM

That has been disproved many times. Keep on claiming it if makes you feel better, but it is not true.
Anonymous said…
Plenty of other safety and security incidents are waiting to come to light. Wallace and his team are keeping a tight lid on everything. No on wants to spoil the illusion that Terry's boyhood dream of becoming the best director ever at Los Alamos has come true.
Anonymous said…
Rumors are coming out about multiple crit and nuc safety failures that have happened in recent months and Wallace is indeed keeping a tight lid on them.
Anonymous said…
April 17, 2018 at 1:01 PM

Yes, several of the recent failures are being swept under the rug by Wallace and his circle.
Anonymous said…
Wallace believes that LANL knows better than everybody else therefore problems are not really problems. They are just the way LANL does it, "The right way". He truly believes that LANL is smarter than everybody else in nuclear operations in the world. He has said as much to the NNSA. I cannot believe that the NNSA agreed for him to be Lab director. Hilarious.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.