From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use. touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
Comments
Why not choose the most qualified person?
By the way what is being proposed is actually racists and illegal. You cannot simply say "we must hire an American American Director at LLNL".
When ever you see statements like these just exchange the words "African American" or black with "White" or "Jew" and see how it sounds. If it sounds racists that is because it is no matter what race you put in.
Also I would be very careful trusting anything from Bothwell, if you know anything about him he seems like opportunists and if it suited his agenda he would be saying the exact opposite the next day.
Why would you make such a statement? "Seems like" ?
Interesting position since LLNS Staff Relations (legal department) is loaded with "people of color" meaning non-white. Why is that? Hmm.
8/30/2020 12:09 PM
There is no "most qualified" candidate for positions like lab Director, but there will be many equally qualified, if the hiring committee has done its job. In such cases AA/EO demands hiring the minority applicant.
and you need to read 41CFR60-2.1.