Skip to main content

Sandia Labs Goes Nuclear On Employee

Starting to get around

Sandia Labs Goes Nuclear On Employee Who Sparked Internal Revolt Over Critical Race Theory

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sandia-labs-goes-nuclear-employee-who-sparked-internal-revolt-over-critical-race-theory

Comments

Anonymous said…
It seems unlikely to me the Peery was pushing this critical race theory nonsense. While he is spineless, and expects his subordinates to be more so, he isn’t stupid.
Anonymous said…
I saw a recent photograph of Peery, Girrens, and Eric Wollerman at KCNSC. It was very telling that Girrens was standing boldly in (purple mask) center and in front of both Perry and the Wollerman. Who's in charge at Sandia? Girrens next LLNL Director or next Sandia Director? Good luck guys. Let's just say Perry has very motivated subordinate managers waiting for just the right opportunity. This might be it.
Anonymous said…
The Peter principle caught up with Girrens about a decade ago. Therefore it makes perfect sense that he would become LLNL Director.
Anonymous said…
Has anyone else noticed how much "CRT" adheres to the techniques of brainwashing proven so effective by the North Koreans and their allies in the Korean conflict?
Anonymous said…
If Girrens becomes director of anything, I'll be surprised, because it will mean DOE/NNSA is clueless and has forgotten how to vet candidates.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...