Everyone is saying how the new Oppenheimer will be the film of the year and how it could save Hollywood. Some other directors describe it as a kind of horror movie.
https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/chris-nolan-says-another-director-called-oppenheimer-a-horror-movie#:~:text=Christopher%20Nolan%20Says%20Fellow%20Filmmaker,entire%20cities%20is%20pretty%20terrifying.&text=%22Now%20I%20am%20become%20Death%2C%20the%20destroyer%20of%20worlds.%22
I think we should make a movie about Edward Teller instead of Oppenheimer, one that is historically accurate and not a Oppenheimer horror story.
Comments
All I know is that Nanos would not have put up with some clown cowboy like Oppenheimer and would shut the 1945 lab down as fast as he could. What was done at Los Alamos that could not be done elsewhere?
As you can see Los Alamos has always been a problem filled with problems and cowboys. Lewis Strauss/Tony Stark is great American hero who like Nanos "got it".
If Oppenheimer and his associates didn't leak the nuclear bomb secrets to the Soviets, America would have been the only country with a nuclear bomb
America could have potentially pushed the soviets out of eastern europe because it had a nuclear weapon and saved the millions of slavic (and other) people 80 years of crushing communism that they are still catching up from.
Classic line from Von Neumann: "If you say why not bomb [the Soviets] tomorrow, I say, why not today? If you say today at five o'clock, I say why not one o'clock?"