Skip to main content

Is Google Gemini 3 the best?

 There wasn't a post yet on this somehow, but Google's latest AI is reportedly quite a bit ahead of others in performance:


https://www.thealgorithmicbridge.com/p/google-gemini-3-just-killed-every

Comments

Anonymous said…
Most of these reports on which model is currently the best are BS. First of all, the metrics don't measure what matters to most scientists and engineers, they mainly measure stuff like writing emails, drafting memos and other language stuff.

Second, there are so many metrics that the companies can just pick the few that their models excel at and claim they are the best. Regardless, they can game the test by training the model to do well specifically on certain metrics.

Lastly, since we are in an AI bubble, the media is in a frenzy over every minor, incremental improvement. If one model is 10% better than the others, it is a revolution and AGI is around the corner. But we were promised exponential scaling of performance and since GPT 4, all we've gotten is AI video generators and higher hallucination rates.
Anonymous said…
It is way better than open AI.
Anonymous said…
I keep seeing Youtube videos about how most jobs will be gone in 24 months, or by 2027 all mundane intellectual jobs will be gone. Some of the videos are 6 month old so we have 18 month left? Others are saying that maybe one administrative assistant will be able to do the job of 5-10 people in 24 months...19 months now.

I am not sure any of the is is true. I predict that with at LANL the opposite will will happen. I am not saying that AI will not be super intelligent and could do the job of 5 people. What will happen at the NNSA labs is someone will say "AI tell me how to make make more paper work, make more crazy rules, and absurd procedures and tell us how we can justify hiring 5 more people for every one person we actually need" AI in all its power will figure out how to do it. In other words the NNSA labs will use AI to SUPERCHARGE inefficiencies, what use to take only week in paperwork will not take months, things that could be done in day or two will be three more weeks. AI will make paper work so insanely complex that the only way to solve these propels will be to use another AI! In the end we will be 10 times slower thanks to AI, but at the same time become twice as fast with AI, and will be spun as great success.

I am serious. In the past two to three years I have seen the inefficiencies actually grow, things are slower and far more inefficient, than before. Some claim this is due to a backlash against DOGE, or Covid I am not sure.
Anonymous said…
AI is the most disruptive technology since the invention of fire. Everything is changing, and AI will be becoming massively more powerful in the next 24 months. Musk who is the greatest genius of the last 100 years has even said work is coming to the end so that if you want to keep working it will be as a hobby since there is nothing you can do that AI cannot do hundred or thousands of times faster. The DOE labs, universities and all of technology has already been transformed since ChatGP came out in 2022, imagine what will happen in 2 years? Everything will change. Is there some danger, maybe but there is nothing we can do about it.
Anonymous said…
Musk's genius is negated by his lack of empathy and association with MAGA. Have you heard the saying "people don't care how much you know until they know how much you care"?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!