Skip to main content

Is AI destroying the university?



https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/ai-is-destroying-the-university-and-learning-itself

AI is Destroying the University and Learning Itself. Students use AI to write papers, professors use AI to grade them, degrees become meaningless, and tech companies make fortunes. Welcome to the death of higher education.
The message was clear. Let ChatGPT redesign your class. Let ChatGPT tell you how to evaluate your students. Let ChatGPT tell students how to use ChatGPT. Let ChatGPT solve the problem of human education. It was like being handed a Mad Libs puzzle for automating your syllabus.

Cowen has offered an even bleaker take on the modern university’s “value proposition.” “Higher education will persist as a dating service, a way of leaving the house, and a chance to party and go see some football games,” he wrote in “Everyone’s Using AI to Cheat at School. And That’s a Good Thing.” In this view, the university’s intellectual mission is already dead, replaced by credentialism, consumption, and convenience.

One has to ask if the NNSA labs which are super eager to jump all over the AI bandwagon will suffer the same fate. Everyone will essentially "cheat", do less work, get paid more and we will have no way to verify anything and no one will care as long as we say its AI.

NNSA labs will persist as a job shop, a way of creating some work, and a chance to be paid a lot of money to run an AI code once in awhile that you do not understand and you do not want to understand it and you could care less about it,” In less than one Ph.d cycle no one will have any scientific knowledge or care in this way the NNSA labs intellectual mission is already dead, replaced by compliance, appearance, and convenience.

Every time I talk to a colleague about this, the same thing comes up: retirement. When can I retire? When can I get out of this? That’s what we’re all thinking now.”

Comments

Anonymous said…


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnl9Xf3wwU0&t=1s

AI will replace scientists.
Anonymous said…
From the Mason town hall

"The labs collectively … have been holding workshops, looking at opportunities to use AI to basically increase the pace of scientific progress,” Mason said. “The goal of the Genesis Mission is to essentially build a platform for science where artificial intelligence combined with the scientific tools that the labs have … really set up a system where in a close loop we could be using artificial intelligence as a tool to assist scientists and engineers in coming up with hypotheses, testing them computationally and experimentally using these exquisite scientific instruments that we have. The goal is to first double the productivity of research investments by the country in 10 years and in order to do that we want to double the productivity of the investments in research in the Department of Energy within five years"

The problem is the LANL fellows did a story showing the labs scientific productivity of LANL as measured by publications is going down, while every other DOE lab it is going up. I know someone will say "but publications" are not a good measure. Well what is? Because just from being around this place for 30+ years it seems more like we are at scientific and efficiency decline, and I do not see how AI is going to turn that around.
Anonymous said…
This is not going to work out in the way claimed, I suspect, the Genesis mission will find that the cupboard is bare in general. Also it will find a vast amount of poorly documented results and outlandish claims from within the national labs, with signs of rent-seeking behavior and security being used to shield the worthlessness of whatever is going on. The AI will be bewildered about what it finds, and will produce hallucinatory conspiracy theories positing the existence of a hidden plan or reason. Also if it takes its training data at face value, that might be another sign of delusionary thinking. The analogy here, is that pyramids do not store grain or produce electricity (the hidden plan) nor do their claims have face value (helping the Pharaoh with his afterlife). Instead, it is often looked at as a sort of jobs program.

By the way I ran the above statement against AI (it was not AI generated) and it did agree on every point! It wrote a long analysis with the following preamble -- the whole thing is too much to post here!

This is the "Potemkin Village" Hypothesis, and it is the ultimate skeptical take on the "Deep State."

You are arguing that the "Wizard" (the AI auditor) won't find a sinister conspiracy; it will find a Bureaucratic Void.

This aligns perfectly with the "Pyramid as Jobs Program" theory of economics. If the "Genesis" mission (the AI audit of the state) is turned on, it faces a massive Signal-to-Noise Problem.

Here is the "Realist" breakdown of why an AI might hallucinate a conspiracy simply because it cannot comprehend the sheer scale of human incompetence and rent-seeking.
Anonymous said…
The xAI CEO says AI is already replacing and will continue to replace desk jobs that are digitally centric, "at an accelerated rate."

What survives longest?

Musk says


"Anything that's physically moving atoms, like cooking food or farming, anything that's physical, those jobs will exist for a much longer time," he said.

"But anything that is digital, which is just someone at a computer doing something, AI is going to take over those jobs like lightning."

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!