Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
-
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
-
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will have a huge negative effect on the ...
-
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref...
7 comments:
I think this is the paper: http://www.psfc.mit.edu/icf/Home%20Page/Papers/Lindl_PoP-2014.pdf
Who could get through such a long paper? I just read the end about the high foot stuff. Doesn't seem out of the ordinary to me. Lindl is a pretty smart guy.
This thread started with "I hear..." and asked for details. Here they are:
you heard wrong
"Papergate", it's all over NIF.
That paper follows in the glorious tradition of LLNL and the deuterium EoS scandal.
So the paper does exist. I would like to hear more on the reaction to the paper; who reacted, how they reacted, what level were they in the power structure.
It is loaded with confirmation bias.
Post a Comment