Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
Good article in Nature News on progress on Z with a mention of NIF's problems http://www.nature.com/news/triple-threat-method-sparks-h...
-
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualification...
-
" ...If there were damning factual evidence of anything untoward, it would obviously have been brought forward with great fanfare......
7 comments:
I think this is the paper: http://www.psfc.mit.edu/icf/Home%20Page/Papers/Lindl_PoP-2014.pdf
Who could get through such a long paper? I just read the end about the high foot stuff. Doesn't seem out of the ordinary to me. Lindl is a pretty smart guy.
This thread started with "I hear..." and asked for details. Here they are:
you heard wrong
"Papergate", it's all over NIF.
That paper follows in the glorious tradition of LLNL and the deuterium EoS scandal.
So the paper does exist. I would like to hear more on the reaction to the paper; who reacted, how they reacted, what level were they in the power structure.
It is loaded with confirmation bias.
Post a Comment