BLOG purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email

Wednesday, August 5, 2015

Y-12 worker sues CNS for lost vacation

August 4, 2015 by Frank Munger, Knox News

A complaint filed Tuesday in Anderson County Circuit Court challenges a government contractor’s authority to change the vested vacation benefit for employees at the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant in Oak Ridge.

The lawsuit against Consolidated Nuclear Security — a contractor team that includes Bechtel National, Lockheed Martin and other companies — was filed on behalf of Richard Michelhaugh, a Clinton resident who has worked at Y-12 for the more than 28 years.

In the complaint, Knoxville attorney Greg Coleman proposes that the action be broadened to include others actively employed at Y-12 — as well as some recent retirees affected financially by the end-of-year benefit changes. The retirees reportedly lost the payout for vacation time that had been accrued but unused.

CNS did not immediately provide comment on the lawsuit.

There has been a firestorm of complaints by Y-12 employees and retirees about benefits changes since CNS took over management of the Oak Ridge plant — and its sister plant, Pantex — last year, but this apparently is the first lawsuit to seek reinstatement of old benefits.

The lawsuit said CNS distributed a “Standing Order” on Dec. 11, 2014, informing the plaintiff and other Y-12 employees were informed on Dec. 11, 2004.

The CNS order reportedly replaced the vacation, personal and sick leave for salaried Y-12 employees with accrued “Paid Time Off” or PTO.

Portions of the Vacation Plan previously in place were not “compatible” with the new PTO policy or Consolidated Nuclear Security’s contract with the Department of Energy, the order states.

The complaint apparently pertains to Y-12 salaried workers paid on a weekly or monthly basis and does not include hourly workers covered by union contracts that have to be negotiated.

The lawsuit seeks the reinstatement of the previous Vacation Plan and restoration of benefits, as well as monetary damages to the Michelhaugh and other Y-12 employees, legal costs and “further relief as may be deemed necessary and proper.”


Anonymous said...

Sorry guys, no one cares about the Production Plants (i.e. Pantex, Kansas City, Y-12). You guys are burden to the Nuclear Weapon Complex (NWC). You have to be computing something to be "somebody" in the NWC.

Anonymous said...


1. Y-12 employees were given reduced benefits by fiat as a result of the contact change.

2. Those employees covered by labor contacts were exempted from the benefits reduction.

NNSA will hurt YOU unless you are protected. A Tyler "the liar" Pryzbylek clone is already employed by NNSA procurement drafting terms of the new contact and " efficiencies" and " overhead cost control" are the cover this liar will use to


as was done when the LANL and LLNL management contacts were rewritten in 2007 and 2008.

Decide now that you will not he treated the same way again. Let those who can, hear..

You have about 3 - 6 months to take the initiative.

Anonymous said...

LANL doesn't care. The place is full of self aggrandizing folks. It's an "all about me" culture, from the bottom to top. I know, I've worked there for 35-years.

addirigib said...

It is having more ideas and information. I am very happy to reading this one Essay writing service reviews is great site for providing the reviews papers.

Anonymous said...

Baaaaaah. Baaaaaaaah. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.


Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...