Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
THIS BLOG WILL NOT POST ANY MAGA PROPAGANDA OR ANY MISINFORMATION REGARDLESS OF SOURCE.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Sunday, October 1, 2017
Interested Parties
FedConnect Releases Interested Parties List For LANL M&O Contract A list of “interested parties” has been posted by National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) for the four-month transition and a five-year base management and operation contract for Los Alamos National Laboratory. The list, which was released on the FedConnect website Sept. 26, is as follows: * General Dynamics * Huntington Ingalls Industries * Hampton Thomas Associates * SGT, Inc. * Internal Computer Services * efkairia, LLC * TerranearPMW, LLC * Cabrera Services * IBM Global Business Services * Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. * Logan Research * KBRwyle * MAG Aerospace * TechSource, Inc. * Edgewater Tech * Longenecker & Associates, Inc. * Criterion Systems, Inc. * Information International Association, Inc. * Bechtel * Los Alamos Technical Association * Merrick & Company * Sigma Science, Inc. * North GeoEngineering Services, LLC * Advanced Insights Group Inc. * BWX Technologies, Inc. * CSRA LLC *
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
So...for those of us who remain who were too chicken or unable to take the SSVSP for whatever reason .....regrets?
-
Did George W. Bush lie about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq ? Not looking for controversy here, just some facts from former LLNL/LANL e...
-
The end of LANL and LLNL? "After host Maria Bartiromo questioned whether the two plan to “close down entire agencies,” Ramaswamy said...
5 comments:
Essentially nobody.... Anyone shocked. I'm not. Who would want the conditions provided under the RFP. Too much risk with little to no reward.
Nobody, hardly
UC, Texas, Bechtel, Leidos, and a ton of other people. What is your problem with LANL?
Texas: Not registered
Leidos: Not registered
UC: not even registered
The rest besides GD are small-medium businesses.
Whoops, forget BWXT (Current partner)
You have to look at the original article to see the full list, the one posted here was truncated for some reason. Link is, http://www.ladailypost.com/content/fedconnect-releases-interested-parties-list-lanl-mo-contract UT "Systems", UC and Leidos are at the bottom.
Post a Comment