Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Sunday, October 1, 2017

Interested Parties

FedConnect Releases Interested Parties List For LANL M&O Contract A list of “interested parties” has been posted by National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) for the four-month transition and a five-year base management and operation contract for Los Alamos National Laboratory.   The list, which was released on the FedConnect website Sept. 26, is as follows: * General Dynamics * Huntington Ingalls Industries * Hampton Thomas Associates * SGT, Inc. * Internal Computer Services * efkairia, LLC * TerranearPMW, LLC * Cabrera Services * IBM Global Business Services * Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. * Logan Research * KBRwyle * MAG Aerospace * TechSource, Inc. * Edgewater Tech * Longenecker & Associates, Inc. * Criterion Systems, Inc. * Information International Association, Inc. * Bechtel * Los Alamos Technical Association * Merrick & Company * Sigma Science, Inc. * North GeoEngineering Services, LLC * Advanced Insights Group Inc. * BWX Technologies, Inc. * CSRA LLC *

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Essentially nobody.... Anyone shocked. I'm not. Who would want the conditions provided under the RFP. Too much risk with little to no reward.

Anonymous said...

Nobody, hardly

UC, Texas, Bechtel, Leidos, and a ton of other people. What is your problem with LANL?

Anonymous said...

Texas: Not registered
Leidos: Not registered
UC: not even registered

The rest besides GD are small-medium businesses.

Anonymous said...

Whoops, forget BWXT (Current partner)

Anonymous said...

You have to look at the original article to see the full list, the one posted here was truncated for some reason. Link is, http://www.ladailypost.com/content/fedconnect-releases-interested-parties-list-lanl-mo-contract UT "Systems", UC and Leidos are at the bottom.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days