Skip to main content

Homer's answer on 1/8/08 was:

Image
By scooby
Mr Homer Williamson's answer to the question about when are the 3161 comments going to be published on 1/8/08 was:

Responses have been drafted and are under review. Comments and responses will be published to the website in the near future.

I reminded him again. You can too: email:
homer.williamson@oak.doe.gov

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is Homer's response via an anon e-mail from someone I know personally.

"The comments and responses are coming along with the final plan. They are currently under review by NNSA HQ."
1/09/2008 5:04 PM
Anonymous said…
The comments are to show up at this URL. I guess I'll believe it when I see it.

LLNL 3161 Censored Comments
1/12/2008 1:33 PM
Anonymous said…
Where are the comments or was asking for them just another feel good exercise from DOE / NNSA? Maybe the comments being hid so no one knows what was said because it would be embarrassing for the public to see how many people told them how stupid they were. I know of one very long comment that does just that. Want to make a bet it will never be published? That's okay, I have a copy of the original tucked away for occasions just like this.
2/12/2008 4:26 AM
Anonymous said…
Please post anon.

The word on the comments about LLNL 3161 is this.

"The plan is to post them but they are still pending approval by NNSA HQ. The priority was shifted to the VSSOP plan."
2/14/2008 5:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more