Demo or Repo or Indi, really does not matter. We all need to work at changing the way LLNL (LLNS) does business so we can keep our jobs. I'm not going to take sides, but I would like us to provide some realistic input so that hopefully our management will listen as I'm pretty sure they at least have their admins read this Blog for them if they don't read it themselves.
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
Bringing in WFO projects doesn't increase any executive bonuses or up the annual NNSA performance scores, so why should LLNS even care? In their eyes, it just makes LLNS more difficult to manage, so why bother?
With Bechtel now running the show, the biggest desire of the LLC management will be to get new construction projects going at LLNL. That's the easiest way for Bechtel to milk the lab for maximum corporate profits.
If anyone believes LLNS share the traditional values of LLNL, such as passion for mission and respect for the individual, they also believe in GM's extended family and Santa Claus!