Skip to main content

What would you do?

Ok, so you are the king of the lab for a day. Being realistic, you know, really having to operate within a budget, and having to get a job do. What would you do?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Beg the UC Regents to take the lab back.
Anonymous said…
Dump NNSA and try hard to get moved back to Office of science or make the move to DOD.

Stop all LDRD not related to a WFO sponsor or NIF programs. We need focus and funding to those programs bringing in money need to grow.

Remove all the middle management and associated admin management staff positions.

Bulldoze half the site and reduce the footprint.

Sorry....but this would result in more people needing to go.
Anonymous said…
1. Frogmarch every Bechtel lacky out the gate at gunpoint.

2. Send a classified letter to SecDef Gates detailing how screwed up the Weapons Complex really is.

3. Send a unclassified letter to Congress and the White House telling them to talk to Gates. Additionally request that a national defense emergency be declared so that both lab contracts would be immediately terminated and control assumed by DoDef. Under those terms all employees will become Federal employees, with Federal protections, wages, benefits, and retirement programs.

4. Furthermore request a criminal investigation of Betchel, NNSA, and ULM for waste, fraud, abuse and possible treason for subverting the nation's nuclear program.

5. Send a personal letter to every current, layed-off, or retired employee ( or next of kin ) apologising for the wrongs done.

I could do all that for less money than GM spends for lunch - that within the budget?
Anonymous said…
1) I will demote or layoff any one with "deputy" in their title.
2) I will create an AD and put him or her in charge of improving morale
3) I will stand up to NNSA's stupid bureaucratic requirements that add work but no value.
4) I will promote productivity to an equal level as safety and security.
5) I will not tolerate incompetence at any level
6) I will bring back LLNL values through action not words.
Anonymous said…
January 19, 2009 2:45 PM,

Well said. Well said.
Anonymous said…
"Stop all LDRD not related to a WFO sponsor or NIF programs."

Wait, haven't we already run for a decade the experiment of providing about every possible institutional subsidy to the northeast corner?
Anonymous said…
All leadership levels at LLNL need to be reevaluated.....more than the deputies need to go. In chemistry the group leader did little more than ensure you wrote your own PA so they could garner a higher salary and take the credit for doing the work.
Anonymous said…
I would make a flat management structure as follows: The lab head, two deputy lab heads, program leaders, this should be about 6-8, project leaders probably 30-40, and employees. Minimal administrative staff. Except for those managers, everyone, and I mean everyone should be an employee. Employees not doing their job would be fired (as would any manager). Can't be done? Well companies of similar size do it, so don't feed me that BS.

Set performance metrics. Each and every person should have a set of goals, that if met, means greater compensation. These metrics define success or failure. Not something arbitrary. Don't meet your goals? Then less compensation. Don't meet any of your goals? Nice working with you.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!