Skip to main content

D'Agostino to remain head of NNSA

Barrack likes him...
http://www.nnsa.energy.gov/news/2512.htm

Comments

Anonymous said…
Is there ever any good new at the Lab?
Anonymous said…
Nobody else would take this job. It was offered to many. There was no other choice.

As one of the possible replacements said, "Anybody smart enough to do this job would not be dumb enough to take it."

What is not so obvious is that the key staff for D'Agostino have abandoned ship a long time ago. One is currently employed by LLNL.

The weapons complex has never seen such dark days.
Anonymous said…
Bush liked him and so does the new admin.The guy must be something right.
Anonymous said…
If being a bull in a china shop is the job description then D'Ag is perfect.

However, it involves something like oh, safeguarding the nation...
Anonymous said…
The weapons complex has never seen such dark days.

September 7, 2009 8:25 PM


I hate saying this, but they are about to get even darker. Now that Tom D'Agostino has been re-elected to his position, you can expect him to roll out Stage II of his Complex Transformation plan. It won't be good for the existing NNSA weapon lab employees.
Anonymous said…
I give up. This is the last straw. Time to start sending out the resume.
Anonymous said…
wolf in sheep clothing baa baa baa

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!