Skip to main content

Does the Secretary of Energy have a bit too much free time?

Anonymously contributed:

Does the Secretary of Energy have a bit too much free time?

Cal physicist helps confirm Einstein theory
David Perlman, San Francisco Chronicle Science Editor
Monday, February 22, 2010

A UC Berkeley physicist and a Nobel prize-winning colleague now in President Obama's Cabinet report they have confirmed one of Albert Einstein's most revolutionary theories 10,000 times more accurately than ever before.

Einstein's theory of general relativity has already been tested and confirmed to a degree as a true picture of reality by scores of experimenters, ever since he proposed it to the world nearly a century ago.

In the immediate decades after the theory's publication, legend had it that only 12 people in the world could understand it, although physicists have long revered it. Even today, relativity remains an arcane subject for most of us, but it does have relevance to all science and even to everyday life - for meticulous timekeepers, for space explorers, for astronomers studying black holes and even for anyone driving a car with a Global Positioning System device navigating around the Bay Area's tricky freeway mazes.

One basic prediction from Einstein's theory is that the tug of gravity makes clocks slow down.

Now Holger Müller, a physicist at UC Berkeley, together with Steven Chu, former director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and now Obama's energy secretary, as well as Achim Peters of Humboldt University in Berlin, report they have developed what is by far the best confirmation yet of Einstein's monumental achievement.

Details of their work are published in the current issue of the journal Nature…

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/22/BA9U1C2BMF.DTL

Comments

Anonymous said…
And people wonder why Dr. Chu has yet to make good on efforts he announced last year to clean-up the bureaucratic putridity emanating from the DOE? I guess he was just too busy. Maybe next year?
Anonymous said…
Hey! He's busy discovering new ways to get rid of power reactor waste.

His first discovery was that we can just leave it where it's at for 4-5 decades.

His 2nd revelation was that we'll let the Government own the waste & that will be that.

I tell ya, this guy's way smarter than Einstein.
Anonymous said…
Given the usual turnaround time on publications, essentially all of this work was probably completed before Dr. Chu was sworn in as Secretary. Besides, you're not going to suddenly take out everything that makes him a great scientist. Whether he becomes a great reformer of bureaucracy is still TBD. I like to believe he is at least going to give it a serious shot.
Anonymous said…
Let's list the accomplishments of the more recent former Secretaries of Energy to put Chu in perspective. James "Tiger Team" Watkins, Hazel "I'll declassify classified and have caviar in my private DOE jets, thank you very much" O'Leary, Frederico "Boulevard" Pena, Bill "Wen Ho Lee" Richardson, and Spencer "I'll commercialize nuclear weapons" Abraham. Yeah, he fits.
Anonymous said…
If Al Gore can win a Nobel prize, my cat could. So what if Chu has one too - it means nothing.
Anonymous said…
Let's list the accomplishments of the more recent former Secretaries of Energy...

February 24, 2010 8:04 PM

Don't forget James Edwards, the dentist.
Anonymous said…
"Does the Secretary of Energy have a bit too much free time?"

Beats sitting around and watching the dysfunctional NNSA labs slowly revolve around the drain hole.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!