Skip to main content

Democratic senator challenges energy chief on Yucca Mountain

Anonymously contributed:

Democratic senator challenges energy chief on Yucca Mountain decision Washington senator vents to DOE chief

Is Dr. Chu just another politician?

At a Senate hearing, Chu got his latest earful from Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. She demanded to know "who was consulted in making the decision that Yucca Mountain was not viable.

You say that Yucca Mountain is not a workable option, but what seems to be missing is why," she told Chu, asking him repeatedly what science was used to back up the Obama administration's decision to end plans for the underground waste repository.

Murray said billions of dollars have been spent at the Hanford nuclear reservation in her state to clean up and begin packaging liquid nuclear waste for eventual disposal at the proposed Yucca site, but no consideration was given to residents there and other places where highly radioactive waste awaits removal.
"This is really disturbing to me," Murray said. "This leaves everybody just in complete limbo after 30 years of working on this.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/democratic-senator-challenges-energy-chief-on-yucca-mountain-decision-86458462.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
Senators are known to act surprised and outraged! They take little action!
Anonymous said…
So much for science.
Anonymous said…
After 30 wasted years by the DOE building and then endlessly testing Yucca Mountain, it's now time to find another site in the US so that DOE can continue wasting countless more billions in taxpayers' money.

Dr. Chu has not turned out to be the visionary leader for the DOE that many had hoped for. He has no spine.
Anonymous said…
Attempted cover for the administration's caving into Senator Reid of Nevada.
Anonymous said…
Like many others I worked on the Yucca Mountain project and after spending billions of dollars we know:

How to drill a tunnel through a mountain
That it takes a long time to heat up and cool down
That when it heats up, the water is driven back from the hot vessels and when it cools down the water containing various mineral returns
That expensive high nickel alloy work better than copper or steel alloys
That the containers should stay intact for a long time
That very little, if any, radiation would be released into the ground for thousands of years
That we could have modeled these results with a couple of geologist and metallurgist over a long dinner
That we cannot model political decision because they are not based on science but on self serving motives
That officially this project is the biggest fleecing of the American taxpayer and for the most part it was run by corporations under the direction of the federal government.
That government projects or facilities managed by corporations are not productive, efficient, or cost effective, but that some fill their coffers with the tax payer’s money
Anonymous said…
That we cannot model political decision because they are not based on science but on self serving motives

amen

It's why America is on a rapid slide to the bottom.
Anonymous said…
America is falling apart at an alarming rate, even though the news media seems to have not a clue. Prepare for the worst as best you can. The smell of revolution may soon permeate the air.
Anonymous said…
Prepare for the worst as best you can. The smell of revolution may soon permeate the air.

March 14, 2010 4:05 PM

Won't happen. Because the US has a standing army to put down such things. Something many of the Founding Fathers preached against. At the first whisper of revolution, Posse Comitatus (1878) will be repealed by Democrats. Marines will be fighting 50-year old "revolutionaries" in the streets. Guess who wins?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!