Skip to main content

Review of performance reviews

Image
By scooby
Contributed anonymously:

Here's a familiar story:



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB127093422486175363.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsFifth

"It's time to finally put the performance review out of its misery.

This corporate sham is one of the most insidious, most damaging, and yet most ubiquitous of corporate activities. Everybody does it, and almost everyone who's evaluated hates it. It's a pretentious, bogus practice that produces absolutely nothing that any thinking executive should call a corporate plus."


Why not let's form a committee, redesign the process, and make it "better" instead! Oh, I guess we just finished doing that...

Comments

Anonymous said…
Every "thinking executive" maintains a ranked RIF list of employees, just in case. This is how it is legally done.
4/12/2010 9:14 PM
Anonymous said…
A top post, relevant to LLNL, with one comment. 4 days later, nothing. No new posts elsewhere, either. Is anybody home here? Is this blog being served well (or at all) by its administrator?
4/16/2010 7:13 PM
scooby said…
Hey 7:13,
If you are not satisfied with the service I provide with this blog, please feel free to volunteer to help so we can both can serve the BLOG better.
If you do not wish to volunteer your efforts, please feel free to no longer visit.
Thank you for you input!
4/17/2010 8:04 PM
Anonymous said…
7:13 : It's not the moderators fault that LLNL/LANL employees recognize the performance reviews for the scam that they are, and are resigned to simply bending over on schedule.
4/18/2010 9:16 PM
Anonymous said…
Employees complaining about the review process? So what else is new.
4/21/2010 5:14 AM
Anonymous said…
It's not the moderators fault that LLNL/LANL employees recognize the performance reviews for the scam that they are, and are resigned to simply bending over on schedule.

April 18, 2010 9:16 PM

So you are saying that LLNL/LANL employees are spineless and don't deserve this blog or its moderator? I might tend to agree, but keep in mind, that was Doug Roberts' (the ex-LANL blog moderator) view, and look what happened to the LANL blog.
4/21/2010 8:18 PM
scooby said…
Hey! Calm down. No fights over me and your blog. It is our blog. I am just the keeper.
4/21/2010 8:31 PM
Anonymous said…
Service : Customer support was ideal. Girl on the phone possessed a exciting approach and My family and i received moolah rapid.
Value :I really were given a remarkable value mainly because finance costs have been very cheap.
AAA Vancouver Payday Loans 310-4088 Cambie Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2X8 (778) 785-2087 payday loans vancouver
AAA Calgary Payday Loans 1014 Macleod Trail Southeast, Calgary, AB T2G 2M7 (403) 614-4637 payday loans calgary
AAA Ottawa Payday Loans 503 Avenue Gladstone, Ottawa, ON K1R 5N9 (343) 883-1422 payday loans ottawa
AAA Edmonton Payday Loans 10223 97 Street Northwest, Edmonton, AB T5J 0L5 (780) 669-1284 payday loans edmonton
1/25/2011 4:51 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Rumor corner

By scooby
LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
92 comments
Read more