Skip to main content

LANL Sidesteps Safety Rules

Anonymously contributed:
Friday, August 13, 2010

By John Fleck
Journal Staff Writer
Los Alamos National Laboratory, with the approval of its federal managers, has repeatedly sidestepped federal nuclear safety rules at its plutonium laboratories, according to an internal Energy Department investigation.
The rules require detailed analysis of nuclear safety risks, so accidents can be avoided by fixing problems. But because of delays in conducting the studies and completing the required repairs, the lab has repeatedly been granted permission for temporary fixes so operations can continue, according to a report from the Department of Energy's Office of Inspector General.
Such permissions are allowed, but "are intended to be temporary measures" until problems can be fixed permanently, according to a report from the Inspector General, made public Thursday.
No nuclear accidents have resulted from this and other related problems identified by the Inspector General's report.
Los Alamos referred comment on the report to the National Nuclear Security Administration, the federal agency that oversees its work. NNSA spokespeople did not return calls for comment.

Read more: ABQJOURNAL NORTH: LANL Sidesteps Safety Rules http://www.abqjournal.com/north/132318126681north08-13-10.htm#ixzz0wWb1ye82

Comments

Anonymous said…
"No nuclear accidents have resulted from this and other related problems identified by the Inspector General's report." LANS/NNSA

Another way of saying we are aware we are violating the law and have been lucky no worker/public has lost a limb or life, so life is good.
Anonymous said…
Will this hurt the 20% PBI bonus for me and Bret Knapp for next year?

(Mikey)
Anonymous said…
"Another way of saying we are aware we are violating the law and have been lucky no worker/public has lost a limb or life, so life is good."

The overwhelming majority of DOE safety (and security) issues is nothing but compliance BS that DOE's worthless bureaucrats push to perpetuate their existence.

Ever since Adm Watson's Tiger Teams of the late 1980s, DOE has wasted hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars addressing problems that exist only on paper.

The fact that the Lab contractors are now for profit guarantees that this process will continue. In public LANS and LLNS will acknowledge they need to do better and accept the fines they receive. These fines are, however, simply a business expense they occasionally have to pay as a "kickback" to the millions of dollars of award fee they receive.
Anonymous said…
Also note that the cost of fixing these problems, except for the fines, do not come out of LANS' pocket. Unlike a real private business, LANS will just skim the money off of other DOE and WFO work.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!