Skip to main content

UTPE/SPSE meeting

Image
By scooby
Today, 2/28, Jeff Colvin, on behalf of UTPE and SPSE presented the same presentation he did in January in front of the National Academy of Science. He provided guidelines the commissions, newly formed to audit LLNL and LANL management by the LLCs, should be looking for. More on this later.
I asked SPSE/UTPE to make the presentation available to this BLOG.
As of 3/2/2011 8:12PM: no reply.
Scooby

Comments

Anonymous said…
Would it be possible for Jeff to post this presentation on the UPTE/SPSE Web Site?
3/01/2011 3:22 AM
scooby said…
I asked them. I will as soon as I get it
3/01/2011 8:14 PM
Anonymous said…
If the (non) response by UPTE/SPSE is any indication of how a union will represent or not represent LANS/LLNS employees I would not be interested in joining. Furthermore, It appears they went forward on this to the National Academy without any feedback. Colvin is just representing his own ego and own views.
3/06/2011 9:10 AM
Anonymous said…
Don't fill out the "INFORMATION ONLY" cards no matter what BS they tell you.

It's a typical union fib.
It means your voting to join a union.

Unless you want to be a drone.
3/06/2011 3:06 PM
Anonymous said…
Also in Michigan all the home daycare workers were sent these cards.
When they filled out their information and returned them they (unknowingly) were voting to join a union.

Now the union takes out dues from the government portion of their pay (if a kids daycare is subsidized).

In my opinion all unions are that corrupt.
3/06/2011 3:13 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more