Skip to main content

How is the Livermore Open Campus project doing?

Does anyone know?

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think they are working out the details of the modular unit which is a placeholder for the new building.
Anonymous said…
I understand that a bronze 60-foot high statue of Anastasio is planned for the mall area. It reads: "Anastasio the Last Great Director of LLNL" NOT!
Anonymous said…
The lines in the parking lot have been painted.
Anonymous said…
The "open campus" concept is upside down, fatally flawed.

The DOE is looking for an excuse to save money by dumping what they incorrectly assess to be redundant LLNL from the weapons complex (ala, the 1990's Bay Area military base closures), rather than anticipating a market driven response to local pent-up real-estate demand.

Who the heck is wants to leave new, inexpensive, synergistic SF Rincon Basin, Silicon Valley, Berkeley or San Ramon for a remote, polluted, ancient, difficult-access campus, with the taint of unpopular technical activity, that sits atop the Greenville fault?

A simple market survey of potential customers would resolve this in less than a year.

The LLNL location is a very nice, perhaps the most pleasant, weapons complex location, but that's it. Absent weapons related activities and continuing subsidies, it will never compete for University or industry on it's own merit. Look around and you see more rust belt than high tech.

The leaders of LLNS and even more so DOE, are inexperienced development dilettantes who lack something productive to do. They do not understand competitive industry or market economies. Sadly, in this and other "industrial" arenas, they are dumber than Donald Trump; in D'Agostino's case, Donald Duck.

For the most likely outcome, think now defunct and rusting Hunter Point and Mare Island Naval Bases and Alameda Naval Air Station.

Dead zones. Good open spaces to film the high-jinx of "Mythbusters" episodes

And to think the duped taxpayer hands $45M to LLNS "best practices" for this. And probably double that amount each year for incompetent DOE leadership.

It is an ongoing travesty of the formerly UC well-run LLL, who continually and appropriately ignored the dumb demons of Forrestal.
Anonymous said…
What is ironical about this "open campus" at LLNL is that an engineering open campus was also the vision of many former Los Alamos "real leaders'. The plans were set forth during the 1980's, John Ruminer in particular moved this vision forward. The open campus integrated office and test facilities at S-site, TA-16. As soon as Bret Knapp arrived he set afire the plans so that he (and Anastasio) could earn extra bonus money which they have pocketed. S-site is now a wasteland. Thanks Knappy and Mikey for killing this vision; all for a few bucks!
Anonymous said…
Good overview of LVOC in this month's LLNL Science & Technology Review magazine online at...

https://str.llnl.gov/Mar11/koonce.html

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!