Skip to main content

Surprise, surprise, surprise!!!

Anonymously contributed: Another GAO study of NNSA Surprise, surprise, surprise!!! "Nevertheless, NNSA continues to experience major cost and schedule overruns on its projects, such as research and production facilities and nuclear weapons refurbishments, principally because of ineffective oversight and poor contractor management." http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-867T

Comments

Anonymous said…
This report will make some good kindling for McMillan's and Knapp's fireplaces up in Los Alamos this winter.
Anonymous said…
Another "worthless" report on the Lab(s). It's amazing that the government (e.g. DOE-IG, GAO, DNFSB ) writes all this wasted language. The reports themselves are waste, fraud, and abuse of the taxpayers money since the reports are just tossed in the trash after they are written.
Anonymous said…
How many reports documenting the decline of the nuclear weapons labs does this make? 10? 20? 30?

Nothing ever comes of it.
How sad.
Anonymous said…
This report will make some good kindling for McMillan's and Knapp's fireplaces up in Los Alamos this winter.

July 9, 2012 5:16 PM

Does Knapp have a fireplace in Los Alamos? This begs the question if he has a house in Los Alamos? Certainly he can burn the report in his house "at Livermore".
Anonymous said…
Does McMilian still have his home in California, where his wife works and all his family live?
Anonymous said…
Charlie has had one year to demonstrate his ability to lead an organization. Talk to survivors of the Nanos years and discover that one year in, Charlie is making a hard run for being the least effective Director in history. Now that's a legacy to be proud of!
Anonymous said…
I can assure you that the remaining LANL staff will be eagerly longing for the "McMillan years" once Charlie leaves and Brett Knapp is crowned as LANL's next Director.

It's amazing to think that someone with Brett Knapp's poor credentials is already being allowed to lead the LANL weapons directorate into the ground as the nuclear weapons Principal Associated Director (PAD).

This is a man who can barely conceal his disdain of all things labeled 'Los Alamos'. He doesn't even bother to practice the McMillan illusion of owning a home here or staying around over the weekends. He hates the place!
Anonymous said…
It was easy for Charlie to buy the most expensive house in Los Alamos and go back to his home and family in California each weekend. No illusion there.
Anonymous said…
Come on give McMillan a break on this one. He was just following the example of Wallace and Mara by having a weekday house in Quemazon and spending every weekend at home with his family out of state.
Anonymous said…
July 15, 2012 8:51 AM

Wallace??? You're kidding right? Do you even know who his mother was?
Anonymous said…
This is a man who can barely conceal his disdain of all things labeled 'Los Alamos'. He doesn't even bother to practice the McMillan illusion of owning a home here or staying around over the weekends. He hates the place!

July 13, 2012 9:19 AM

Knapp makes "no bones" about "being forced to come to work at Los Alamos". However, every evening he get's-off revving his Porsche to make himself feel better.
Anonymous said…
Knapp = 0.
Anonymous said…
No. Chu=0, Knapp=-10

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...