Another Los Alamos managed project over budget and behind schedule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming on the heels of the recent LANL radiation safety incident this can only be bad news.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.abqjournal.com/main/2012/10/26/north/213m-project-not-working.html
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
What a sad state of affairs at this once prestigious lab.
NNSA has a site office at Los Alamos, wonder what they do?
October 27, 2012 6:37 PM
There is no one at the Los Alamos Site Office who has any technical competence in any field; weapons, science, safety, security, they are all totally incompetent pencil-pushers. They actually rely on the Santa Fe - based anti-nukes to tell them what to look for and care about. Absolutely atrocious, and no one seems to care, especially not DC-based NNSA. THe failures at LANL are in my opinion almost completely traceable to LASO incompetence. They wield their authority like a hammer, require nonsensical actions, and refuse to recognize the value of real competence at LANL. They relish their authoritative interactions with LANL underlings whom they can intimidate, and stay away from the upper management.
NNSA will have new leadership, but the problems will be enduring - unless there is a major change in the contractor. The UC influence that permitted the scandals, that in turn led to the creation of NNSA, is still strongly present today.
The solution to the current mess is not as simple as shuffling personnell in NNSA, which looks a lot like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
October 28, 2012 9:58 AM
Interesting questions, but not relevant to addressing the key issue. If you want true and lasting change, look at what Gates did in the Air Force weapons case. He fired the top two leaders, as well as a couple dozen high ranking officers, about half of them General officers.
Being Lab Director is about more than buying the most expensive house in the county and holding all- hands meetings to present slide shows of summer trips. At least it used to be about more.
Seven years to build a fence that doesn't work.
With credibility like this, wonder what else doesn't work?
Since Bechtel took over management of the labs for a fat annual profit in 2006 things have really changed, haven't they?
Just wait until Brett Knapp is crowned LANL Director in a couple of years after Charlie leaves with his fat pension and run back to California for the good life.
He is doing the best he can. It is not his fault that he has neither background nor experience in the issues that keep popping up. He was the result, after all, of an exhaustive search process.
Just imagine what it would be like under someone else, and then be sure to properly thank those that selected him.
October 29, 2012 11:01 PM
Thank God I'll be retired when this "clown" takes over. The Pueblos and surrounding communities will love this bigot!