Skip to main content

Tauscher Picked For NNSA Governance Panel



Weapons & Complex Monitor
March 6, 2013

Tauscher Picked For NNSA Governance Panel

The Congressionally mandated National Nuclear Security Administration governance panel is beginning to take shape. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has named former California Democratic lawmaker and Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Ellen Tauscher to the 12-person panel, following on the heels of House Speaker John Boehner’s selection of former Rep. Heather Wilson (R-N.M.).

Tauscher [now a member of the LLNS/LANS Boards of Governors] was instrumental in the creation of the NNSA during her time as the representative for California’s 10th District, and helped create the Strategic Posture Commission while she was the chair of the House Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee. She also famously feuded with Pelosi during the early part of her career in Congress, backing Steny Hoyer instead of Pelosi for House Minority Whip in 2001, but they later mended fences.

The 12-member panel will be selected by the House and Senate Armed Services committees and leadership of the House and Senate, with each committee selecting four members and House and Senate leadership selecting two members apiece. Funded by a $3 million authorization in the Fiscal Year 2013 Defense Authorization Act, the committee was supposed to have its first meeting by March 1, but it has been slow to get going due to funding constraints under the current Continuing Resolution that prohibit the start of new programs. A new CR that would fund the Defense Department and other government agencies through the end of the year unveiled by House appropriators this week would allow the study to begin.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Boy, there's $3M that should have been sequestered! What a waste of taxpayers money!
Anonymous said…
Well maybe the GAO can sniff out a possible conflict of interest here since she is on the LLNS/LANS Board. But as a former member of the "Club", she probably is exempt from such trifling detail. Rules are for the little people.
Anonymous said…
Even a blind man can see that there is an incredible conflict of interest here. This is such a blatant flaunting of the rules of conflict of interest that one can only guess at what strings were pulled to make it happen. How many more members or consultants of the LLNS Boards will be picked for this "impartial" panel?
Anonymous said…
The "fix is in", as they say. Anyone really surprised by this news?
Anonymous said…
Who's next to be added to this joke called the NNSA Governance Panel? Riley Bechtel?
Anonymous said…
Based on how this has gone so far, here are the names of the remaining members of this august body that has been charged with examining the NNSA. It might not be the final list, since there are also lots of sub-Boards that have highly compensated members and consultants.

NORMAN J. PATTIZ
CRAIG M. ALBERT
STEVEN BECKWITH
WILLIAM FRAZER
JOHN GORDON
JOHN P. HOWANITZ
DONALD J. KINTZER
STEVEN KOONIN
GLENN MARA
RICHARD MIES
DAVID PETHICK
ELLEN O. TAUSCHER
BRUCE D. VARNER
JEFF WADSWORTH
DAVID WALKER
CRAIG WEAVER

Anonymous said…
Seriously ... another architect of this horrendous mess called the NNSA is going to try to fix it?

Our government is beyond dysfunctional.
Anonymous said…
It's not just dysfunctional. It's incestuous!
Anonymous said…
NNSA governance... so, they're one ivory tower higher than the organization in the ivory tower...
Anonymous said…
NORMAN J. PATTIZ
CRAIG M. ALBERT
STEVEN BECKWITH
WILLIAM FRAZER
JOHN GORDON
JOHN P. HOWANITZ
DONALD J. KINTZER
STEVEN KOONIN
GLENN MARA
RICHARD MIES
DAVID PETHICK
ELLEN O. TAUSCHER
BRUCE D. VARNER
JEFF WADSWORTH
DAVID WALKER
CRAIG WEAVER

March 7, 2013 at 9:36 AM

Same monkeys in a different tree!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!